hydrogen
The article states that hydrogen-based car engines are a good replacement for petroleum-based engines and provides 3 reasons to support. But, the lecturer challenges these statements made by the author. She is of the opinion that none of these reasons is correct.
First of all, the author suggests that hydrogen does not generate from a finite resource whereas the internal-combustion engines use gasoline and diesel that are from a limited resource. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that to use hydrogen in engines, it should be derived from its sources like water and gas and then turn in to a pure liquid. With regard to this, it does not produce easily.
Secondly, the writer contends that the fuel-cell engines have high efficiency associated with pollution in comparison with the petroleum-based engines so that it can be a solution for the pollution problem. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that although this fuel can create less pollution, the producing process of hydrogen from its resources is highly polluter.
Finally, it is stated in the article that by using hydrogen as a fuel, the cost of operating the cars will decrease due to the high efficiency of the hydrogen-based engines. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits this by mentioning that manufacture for generating these engines use platinum. This component is expensive and scarce. Hence the price of a car will increase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | taknam | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | nilav | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-29 | negooo | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | 1ms19ec133 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 334, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...This component is expensive and scarce. Hence the price of a car will increase.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, first of all, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18803418803 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01499890938 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559829059829 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.9358631564 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3846153846 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2304315083 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759366978308 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106457113459 0.0662205650399 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151104447842 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461741847264 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.