integrated task
The reading proposes that vessels found near Iraq cannot be electronic batteries which produced electricity. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
The author argues that due to the fact that there are no other electronic objects found with them that they could attach them for being electronic conductive. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that it is true that nothing found with the batteries such as wire or other devices. The batteries are found by local people, not archeologists that are not trained people, then they do not recognize the metal device near the batteries .therefore, they might be overlooked either threw them away.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that these batteries look like Seleucia cylinder used for holding scrolls, On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that it is possible that these batteries originated from Seleucia, yet they might have been used for another purpose. When they got iron they produced electricity. In addition, copper used for other objects as well.
Finally, the reading asserts that the application of these batteries are useless since there is no device to use their electricity. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that these batteries may have been used for mild shocked. When someone touched them. Some may have been convinced people having magic power. Furthermore, these batteries used for healing. In modern medicine, it is used for relieving the pain. Therefore, in ancient time people used them for the same purpose.
- peary's journey 70
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 60
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than they do similar tasks all day long. 66
- The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 66
- task 1 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nize the metal device near the batteries .therefore, they might be overlooked eith...
^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ght have been used for another purpose. When they got iron they produced electricity...
^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es may have been used for mild shocked. When someone touched them. Some may have bee...
^^^^
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ed. When someone touched them. Some may have been convinced people having magic powe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, furthermore, however, look, may, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, in contrast, such as, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22093023256 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54335934587 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.7928363086 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.