Integrated TPO 45
The passage and the lecture both discuss whether or not the discovered fossil structures in Arizona were created by bees as early as 200 million years ago. The reading claims that those fossil structures do not created by bees inside 200 million years ago and provides three supports for holding that opinion. However, the lecture finds all ideas dubious and provides some evidences to repudiate them all.
The reading states that no fossil remnants have been found that date to 200 million years ago and the earliest preserved fossil is only half as old as the fossil structures discovered in Arizona. In contrast, the speaker casts doubt on this claim by stating that it is true that no fossil records are available for bees to that date, but the reason is that for preserving fossil structures of bees, some trees should produce specific resins in order to preserve fossils. However, in 200 million years ago, there was not any tree that be able to produce some resins. Accordingly, it is not reasonable to assume that bees did not live in 200 million years ago because of unavailability of fossil records.
Furthermore, the reading passage argues that in 200 million years ago any flowering plant did not exist, so bees could not be existed in that date because bees are depend on flowers biologically. On the other hand, the lecture brings up the fact that bees existed before creation of flowering plant, and in that date bees adapted to feed on other plants such as Foe and pine trees rather than flowering plant.
Finally, the reading asserts that fossilized structures found in Arizona lack some important details of bees' nest such as caps, so the fossilized structures are related to other insects. Conversely, the professor dismisses the opinion pointing the fact that some chemical experiments reveal that those fossils have some specific chemical substances that produce by bees and have water proofing feature played the role of chambers, which is according to substances produced by modern bees. Therefore, the fossils structures thoroughly represent some details of bees' nests such as chambers.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Some young people have free time in the evenings after school or on days off from school. Which of the following activities would be most beneficial for young people (ages 14-18) to do in their spare time? Why?- Gaining practical work experience either at 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he passage and the lecture both discuss whether or not the discovered fossil structures in Ari...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...e existed in that date because bees are depend on flowers biologically. On the other h...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 350.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06285714286 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5127202919 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482857142857 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.0199621646 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.666666667 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06452816374 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0900093258546 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436003404844 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240255292768 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0611023152375 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00912644067685 0.0443174109184 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.