Integrated writing - TPO 51
The reading explains three fascinating elephant behaviors, while the professor believes that the reading's beliefs are unconvincing and rejects them. Since she affirms that these beliefs are as misunderstanding.
Firstly, the reading claims that elephants are informed of their own death, because they nearing the end of their life go alone to certain locations. Controversy, the professor reckons that old elephants have teeth problems and for better digestion they eat soft vegetation. In fact, they go to other location such as near water to find soft food which usually grow near the water.
Secondly, the reading affirms that they elaborate objects through art which mean that they have artistic ability. In contrast, the professor points out that they have strong ear and easily learn the tricks of painting. Furthermore, they just paint some patterns and all the time repeat same pattern. Actually, the objects which are represented by elephants are not similar to flowers or other objects.
Eventually, although, the reading introduces that another interesting features among elephants is fearing form mice, the professor affirms that this fear is due to they are not familiar with mice in some places, and they do distinct behavior which is natural among them. While in other places such as zoo they do not fear from mice, because they are living with them.
- Essay topics: TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 70
- TPO 50 Independent Writing Task all university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 88
- Tpo- 39-1 3
- TPO-50 16
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2602739726 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58732114921 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584474885845 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7144184958 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.727272727 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.