Tpo 32-2
From the past, different methods of learning and teaching have been introduced for improving education systems. One of these methods is assigning projects to a group of student instead of doing alone. I completely agree with this method for a couple of reason which will be described in the following.
Firstly, Student positively can share their knowledge for performing projects. As a result, not only projects are implemented quickly, but also due to consultation the quality of projects is higher than doing alone. For instance, I clearly recall that at the university my professor assigned a projects in the class for solving a problem. In the first step I decided to solve it by myself and after a week of surfing in the internet, I concluded that I had to consult with my classmates for solving it. Eventually, this problem was solved by a practical solution and after that we could publish this solution in the journal as a article.
Secondly, one of the important criteria for Career progression in the jobs is team working which can be crated in the student from early age. Furthermore, a vast majority of projects in the companies are assigned in the team group. If people do not have the ability to communicate hopefully with other members of the teams, they would have troubles in their work.
This is true that doing projects alone by student can improve the creativity among them, Since, they have to rely on yourselves for solving problems. Despite this, team working can lead to personality growth among them, because in the team they can communicate with each other and their social skills can be increased.
In conclusion, for those reasons I believes the advantages of team working is far outweigh the working alone among students.
- Tpo -48-1 85
- TPO 50 Independent Writing Task all university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 88
- TPO 35- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The “Voynich manuscript,” as it 76
- "Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last yea 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.Use 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a project' or simply 'projects'?
Suggestion: a project; projects
...at the university my professor assigned a projects in the class for solving a problem. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 627, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...publish this solution in the journal as a article. Secondly, one of the importan...
^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'believe'
Suggestion: believe
...ed. In conclusion, for those reasons I believes the advantages of team working is far o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...weigh the working alone among students.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 296.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93918918919 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71466945337 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543918918919 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7924753372 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.