Kaplan 4th Edition - Sample Practice 2 - Genetically Modified Foods

The article claims that planting genetically modifies tress has a number of benefits and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecture explains that the benefits are not enough to justify the benefits of planting genetically modified trees and refutes each of the author's reasons.

First, the article posits that the genetically modified trees are designed to survive in the critical environment. However, the lecture explains that the genetically modified trees are designed to survive in some particular environment. Besides, they are also designed to be tolerated to some certain pets. As a result, if the climate changes or the tress are affected by new pests, the genetically modified trees will be hampered greatly.

Secondly, the article claims that the genetically modified trees provide a number of economic benefits. However, the lecture refutes this point by saying that the trees have hidden cost. According to the lecture, although, the genetically modified trees are again born from the corresponding seeds, the persons who grow them need to pay the authority from which they have bought the trees first.

Third, the article posits that the genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees. However, the lecture refutes this point by saying that although the trees grow rapidly and faster as well, it cannot be a replacement of native wild trees.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...hough the trees grow rapidly and faster as well, it cannot be a replacement of nat...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, well, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40639269406 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71921546275 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 145.348785872 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470319634703 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.571969506 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.636363636 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155324624403 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804890767613 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515535580773 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108151434301 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290543135398 0.0443174109184 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.