lines found on the dinosaurs fossils are not feathers remanants.
The reading and lecture are about the discussion of lines found on Sinosauropteryx. The author of the reading feels that reluctant lines found on the Sinosauropteryx were not the remains of the feathers. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that the leaving lines are the representation of the feathers and proves in the following essay.
To begin with, line imprints found on dinosaur are mostly formed after the death of animals because when it was buried in volcanic ash, it's skin got decomposed into fibers and the lines are the representation of those fibers but not feathers. However, the professor refutes and states that the fossils are not decomposed instead skin decomposes. Additionally, he mentions that other animals that were buried at the same site found beautifully preserved and they don't see any kind of decomposed structures in them. Thus, this opinion of the critics proves wrong.
Secondly, the writer claims that the remnant lines which are found on fossil structures were of frills. The tutor proves this idea of the writer wrong and claims that the major difference between feathers and frills is a protein called beta- carotene which is found in feathers, not in frills. He also adds the point that specific protein was found in the fossils which tells the lines are the leavings of feathers.
Finally, the reading mentions that lines were mostly located on the backbone and tail of the animal which describes the feathers were non-functional. On the other hand, the lecturer says this with an example of a peacock. he mentions that peacock has long tail and feathers on it because it helps in display behavior such as mating so that it attracts the female peacocks, Similarly, the peacock's feathers were with white and orange colors. This statement strongly supports the idea that dinosaurs used their feathers for display.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 70
- In the past eating avocados was not considered to be necessarily beneficial Being unaware of their beneficial properties people used them mostly as avocado oil for different purposes It wasn t until recently that the advantages of consuming avocados were 53
- lines found on the dinosaurs fossils are not feathers remanants 73
- The food industry has been overusing hard to recycle plastic packaging However it has caused severe environmental issues As a solution to the plastic packaging crisis casein based plastic packages which are made out of milk proteins have recently been inv 85
- air purification 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...x were not the remains of the feathers. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...te found beautifully preserved and they dont see any kind of decomposed structures i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... were non-functional. On the other hand, the lecturer says this with an example o...
^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...says this with an example of a peacock. he mentions that peacock has long tail and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, kind of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05095541401 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64694708242 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487261146497 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.914458476 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338565812438 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111172236493 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732998641999 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202293936858 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405704798588 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.