The reading and the lecture both are discussing about the little ice age which has happened for long period. The author of the reading believes that some reasons could lead to this event. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He states that none of these argument are correct and all of them are out-of-date.
First of all, the passage claims that disruptive gulf caused the cooling. The professor contradicts this statement by saying that cooling of temperature in the Europe and north United state could have been caused by disruptive ocean. He states that the other regions have not been affected. So, this explanation cannot be correct.
Moreover, the author of the article asserts that little ice age could have been caused by volcanic eruption. It send a lot of dust into the sky. The professors rejects this by explaining that if they send a great deal of dust into atmosphere, they would have created visual effects. For example, with the presence of dust. the sunlight and snow change their color. So, volcanic eruption could not produce enough dust to change the color.
Thirdly, the passage proposes that forest trees started growing and it absorbs a lot of carbon dioxide. The professor opposes this idea by saying that the trees of forests was cut down in order to provide food for crops. So it cannot affect the climate.
- The Little Ice Age was a period of unusually cold temperatures in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900 C.E. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scientists have long wondered what c 3
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 60
- TPO 45_Integrated writing (bee’s fossils) 3
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practic 81
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70-millio 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... some reasons could lead to this event. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this argument' or 'these arguments'?
Suggestion: this argument; these arguments
... in the article. He states that none of these argument are correct and all of them are out-of-...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sends'?
Suggestion: sends
...ve been caused by volcanic eruption. It send a lot of dust into the sky. The profess...
^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'reject'.
Suggestion: reject
...ot of dust into the sky. The professors rejects this by explaining that if they send a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...For example, with the presence of dust. the sunlight and snow change their color. S...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, third, thirdly, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83690987124 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31591896046 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570815450644 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9434244352 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.2941176471 110.228320801 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7058823529 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88235294118 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0805398309973 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229103555301 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444944066917 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0463624549402 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252720767587 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.