The main topic in readind passage and lecture is about developing of international fund to help forest protection from deforestization. The author claims benefits of tnternational fund to protect forests. However, the le3cturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He mentions, the benifits from these international fund are incorrect.
First, the writer states, international fund established to protect forests agricultuer . The professor fefutes this state. He says, refund to inrease in agriculture need to increase in using petisides also lto land. therefore this will need money than that need for logging industry.
Second, the author asserts, the other use of international fund to develope ecomomiesof villages. The lecturer in the other hand contradicts this notion. He illustrates, these funds go to government or to owner not to people. Therefore, thereis no gaurantee that this fund will be given to people and cause economic development.
Finally, the authorpoints out, these international fund provide humans with goods like cloths food and any medical support. Moreover, human dosemot need to use forests resources for his needs. This notion is challenged by lecturer. He mentions, if these funds do not go to people, therefore, they will have to use trees to supply themselve with their demands.
The main topic in readind passage and lecture is about developing of international fund to help forest protection from deforestization. The author claims benefits of tnternational fund to protect forests. However, the le3cturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He mentions, the benifits from these international fund are incorrect.
First, the writer states, international fund established to protect forests agricultuer . The professor fefutes this state. He says, refund to inrease in agriculture need to increase in using petisides also lto land. therefore this will need money than that need for logging industry.
Second, the author asserts, the other use of international fund to develope ecomomiesof villages. The lecturer in the other hand contradicts this notion. He illustrates, these funds go to government or to owner not to people. Therefore, thereis no gaurantee that this fund will be given to people and cause economic development.
Finally, the authorpoints out, these international fund provide humans with goods like cloths food and any medical support. Moreover, human dosemot need to use forests resources for his needs. This notion is challenged by lecturer. He mentions, if these funds do not go to people, therefore, they will have to use trees to supply themselve with their demands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-07 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
- Education of kids is an essential concern of all parent it is a crucial thing for children future since all parent try to do their best to let kid get advance education Some parents prefer to give their kids money when they get a high score other do not p 66
- Thr reading passage and lecture about creation of strikt brule to regulation coal ash handlind and storage The author states stricts rules are unnecessary The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mrntions these rules are very important to pre 66
- Truth is a essential for any relationship some poeple believe that truth is the most important thing for any type of relationship others have a different thought In my opinion telling the truth is one of the most important concern in individual life Admit 60
- Recent life is so soffisticated question is if its important for young indivitual to be organized and able to plan his live some persons think having the abillity to plan and organize the life is crucial thing other concider that thing is not realy concer 70
- Teachers are paramount factor in student education process They should their best to teach kids crucial things which are essential for their futur The question is whether teachers shouls share their political thoughts with their students or not This can b 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tablished to protect forests agricultuer . The professor fefutes this state. He sa...
^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...rease in using petisides also lto land. therefore this will need money than that need for...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...rease in using petisides also lto land. therefore this will need money than that need for...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than that need for logging industry. Second, the author asserts, the other us...
^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cloths'' or 'cloth's'?
Suggestion: cloths'; cloth's
...nal fund provide humans with goods like cloths food and any medical support. Moreover,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48275862069 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02756701876 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650246305419 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2648867032 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.5625 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6875 21.698381199 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409089331096 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13466587811 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166865143882 0.0662205650399 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270883534958 0.162205337803 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.277952692081 0.0443174109184 627% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.