The main topic in readind passage and lecture is about developing of international fund to help forest protection from deforestization. The author claims benefits of tnternational fund to protect forests. However, the le3cturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He mentions, the benifits from these international fund are incorrect.
First, the writer states, international fund established to protect forests agricultuer . The professor fefutes this state. He says, refund to inrease in agriculture need to increase in using petisides also lto land. therefore this will need money than that need for logging industry.
Second, the author asserts, the other use of international fund to develope ecomomiesof villages. The lecturer in the other hand contradicts this notion. He illustrates, these funds go to government or to owner not to people. Therefore, thereis no gaurantee that this fund will be given to people and cause economic development.
Finally, the authorpoints out, these international fund provide humans with goods like cloths food and any medical support. Moreover, human dosemot need to use forests resources for his needs. This notion is challenged by lecturer. He mentions, if these funds do not go to people, therefore, they will have to use trees to supply themselve with their demands.
The main topic in readind passage and lecture is about developing of international fund to help forest protection from deforestization. The author claims benefits of tnternational fund to protect forests. However, the le3cturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He mentions, the benifits from these international fund are incorrect.
First, the writer states, international fund established to protect forests agricultuer . The professor fefutes this state. He says, refund to inrease in agriculture need to increase in using petisides also lto land. therefore this will need money than that need for logging industry.
Second, the author asserts, the other use of international fund to develope ecomomiesof villages. The lecturer in the other hand contradicts this notion. He illustrates, these funds go to government or to owner not to people. Therefore, thereis no gaurantee that this fund will be given to people and cause economic development.
Finally, the authorpoints out, these international fund provide humans with goods like cloths food and any medical support. Moreover, human dosemot need to use forests resources for his needs. This notion is challenged by lecturer. He mentions, if these funds do not go to people, therefore, they will have to use trees to supply themselve with their demands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-07 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
- Cars are paramount type of transportation they are one of necessary things in live whether cars in twenty years become fewer that today every one has a different view point Some believe in the following decades there are fewer cars other have different pe 60
- The main topic in readind passage and lecture is about developing of international fund to help forest protection from deforestization The author claims benefits of tnternational fund to protect forests However the le3cturer casts doubt on claim made in a 78
- Employees are paly a significant role in success of any project or work Whether workers will enjoy to do many differnt kinds of chores during their work or they will be more satisfy to do same type of work in their day This can be weighed in many aspects 66
- Friendships is an important thing in our life Any person try to maintain a strong relationship with their friend Some believe keeping a friendships with a small numer of people is mor important for to get happience Other believe the opposit is better Adme 60
- The passage and lecture about the artificial reefs the writer demonstrates three benefits of artificial reefs for increasing suitible habitat for fish the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He says several scientists belivieve the artificial re 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tablished to protect forests agricultuer . The professor fefutes this state. He sa...
^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...rease in using petisides also lto land. therefore this will need money than that need for...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...rease in using petisides also lto land. therefore this will need money than that need for...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than that need for logging industry. Second, the author asserts, the other us...
^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cloths'' or 'cloth's'?
Suggestion: cloths'; cloth's
...nal fund provide humans with goods like cloths food and any medical support. Moreover,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48275862069 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02756701876 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650246305419 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2648867032 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.5625 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6875 21.698381199 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409089331096 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13466587811 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166865143882 0.0662205650399 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270883534958 0.162205337803 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.277952692081 0.0443174109184 627% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.