The reading passage and lecture are both discussing type of great houses used by settlement of Chaco canyon in New Mexico. The writer claims three theories
to explain how these buildings were used. However, the lecture casts doubt on claim made in article/ He says, unfortuntily non of these explanation is convincing.
First, the author states, these houses used for residents, each one housing hundreds of people. This statement is challenged by professor. He says, if these houses were used for residential, They suppose to have many fireplaces which are crucail fotrcooking. Instead, that houses only contained few fireplaces which can support only ten families. Moreover, there were more than one hundred families have found in the each house.
Second, the passage asserts, the settlements utilized these houses as storage to keep food supplies like maize. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this notion. He contends, those places have contained only crops like maise. there is no equioments or containers to save these crops. the maize found on the ground without containers.
Lastly, the author points out, Chaco Cayon settlment used these houses for ceremonial purpose, especially, they were found closely to Pueblo Alto which was important house used for ceremony.
The lecturer contradicts this point. He says, there are many things beside pots, there are constructed material like stones and sands, this means that these materials as a trash left by workers.
The reading passage and lecture are both discussing type of great houses used by settlement of Chaco canyon in New Mexico. The writer claims three theories
to explain how these buildings were used. However, the lecture casts doubt on claim made in article/ He says, unfortuntily non of these explanation is convincing.
First, the author states, these houses used for residents, each one housing hundreds of people. This statement is challenged by professor. He says, if these houses were used for residential, They suppose to have many fireplaces which are crucail fotrcooking. Instead, that houses only contained few fireplaces which can support only ten families. Moreover, there were more than one hundred families have found in the each house.
Second, the passage asserts, the settlements utilized these houses as storage to keep food supplies like maize. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this notion. He contends, those places have contained only crops like maise. there is no equioments or containers to save these crops. the maize found on the ground without containers.
Lastly, the author points out, Chaco Cayon settlment used these houses for ceremonial purpose, especially, they were found closely to Pueblo Alto which was important house used for ceremony.
The lecturer contradicts this point. He says, there are many things beside pots, there are constructed material like stones and sands, this means that these materials as a trash left by workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-31 | talelaldabous | 75 | view |
- Anyone in this life may makes mistake accidently but whether we should correct this mistake when we hear it directly or waiting later This can be weighed in many aspects Although some people prefer to correct their teacher or meeting leader mistake right 60
- The reading and lecture about of the uses of the great houses foe the settlements of chaco canyon in New Mexico The author believed that these houses used for this purpose The lecturer casts duobts the argument which made in reading passage he said that b 76
- Advacement of technology now days has uttily influence on all aspect of our life whether the technology has decrease kids creation than in the past or not can be weighted in many aspects in perspective I do not concur with this statement that technology r 76
- The reading passage and the lecture discuss several possibilities about of Little Ice Age the writer claims several reasons beyond occurring of Little Ice Age However the lecturer contradicts each point which is mentioned in article She says unfortunately 75
- The governments play important rule in enhancing welfare for general publics Whether government should spend more money on arts rather than sport this can be weighted in many aspects In my opinion government should fund more for sports to support athletic 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture are both...
^^
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and lecture are both discussing type of great houses used by settlement of Chaco...
^^
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Mexico. The writer claims three theories to explain how these buildings were used...
^^^^
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this explanation' or 'these explanations'?
Suggestion: this explanation; these explanations
...n article/ He says, unfortuntily non of these explanation is convincing. First, the author stat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...s have contained only crops like maise. there is no equioments or containers to save ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ents or containers to save these crops. the maize found on the ground without conta...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32478632479 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52964020227 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628205128205 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0295654867 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.875 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.625 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441195299353 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129036827085 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152905001427 0.0662205650399 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255562711587 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.224385364022 0.0443174109184 506% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.