The passage and lecture are mainly about the Pluto. The author states, Pluto can not be concidedrd as planet. and elaborates on three reason to prove that. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article.by refuting each statement.
First, writer mention the samll size of Pluto. He says, there are many dwarf planets wich may be larger than Pluto and still calssified as a dwarfl planets. The lecterer reputes that statement. He mentions, Pluto is largest is size. Furthermore, it is not fair to classify things according to it size. He illustrate to animals classification, by saying we can not consider small rats as a mammal if we classify them according to the size.
Second, the author argues, the orbit bof Pluto is not clear. He posits, threr are many other objects in its path, therfore it dose not meet critirea for being planet. This argument is contradited by professor. He claims, unclear orbit is not enough eviden to concider Pluto not planet. It should take in count its atomspher which has many gases like nitrogen and hydrogen which might make their orbit unclear. Moreover, it has irregular surface which lead to unclear path of orbit.
Finally, passages mentions, Pluto has more share features with comet compare to planet. In the other hand. Professor states, Pluto also sherd many charactirestic
The passage and lecture are mainly about the Pluto. The author states, Pluto can not be concidedrd as planet. and elaborates on three reason to prove that. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article.by refuting each statement.
First, writer mention the samll size of Pluto. He says, there are many dwarf planets wich may be larger than Pluto and still calssified as a dwarfl planets. The lecterer reputes that statement. He mentions, Pluto is largest is size. Furthermore, it is not fair to classify things according to it size. He illustrate to animals classification, by saying we can not consider small rats as a mammal if we classify them according to the size.
Second, the author argues, the orbit bof Pluto is not clear. He posits, threr are many other objects in its path, therfore it dose not meet critirea for being planet. This argument is contradited by professor. He claims, unclear orbit is not enough eviden to concider Pluto not planet. It should take in count its atomspher which has many gases like nitrogen and hydrogen which might make their orbit unclear. Moreover, it has irregular surface which lead to unclear path of orbit.
Finally, passages mentions, Pluto has more share features with comet compare to planet. In the other hand. Professor states, Pluto also sherd many charactirestic
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-31 | talelaldabous | 65 | view |
- Now days the difficulty of life inforce people to perform a lot of tasks some of persons believe that doing many tasks in the same time will decrease the chance of successful other believe the opposite In my perceptive I concur with the statement that doi 60
- The reading and lecturer are about the dinosaures if they wer considerd as endotherms enamel or not The endotherms are type of animals which can maintain its internal tempreture warmer than surrounding environment The the author states that the dinosaurs 76
- Education is a crucial concern for all parents It is very important factor to get a suitable career in future Therefore if father and mother have more influential affect on their children education or not this can be evaluated in different aspects admitte 70
- Telling the truth is very beautiful thing Any type of relationship should be buited on truthnes between the parent freinds in this order these relationship will continue First the laying is a bad thing when some one hided the fact this will complicate eve
- The passage and lecture are both disscusing uses of great house of Chaco canyon settelments The writer claims three possible uses of these houses The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article He says these suggestive uses are unsupportive First the 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... Pluto can not be concidedrd as planet. and elaborates on three reason to prove tha...
^^^
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...of Pluto. He says, there are many dwarf planets wich may be larger than Pluto and still...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
...lassify things according to it size. He illustrate to animals classification, by saying we...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doses'?
Suggestion: doses
... other objects in its path, therfore it dose not meet critirea for being planet. Thi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97747747748 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53485162683 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626126126126 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8346497186 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 58.1578947368 110.228320801 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.6842105263 21.698381199 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.73684210526 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395879299155 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121020296984 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129433329893 0.0662205650399 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277641522104 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.275397768697 0.0443174109184 621% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.3589403974 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.42 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 10.7273730684 37% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.