The passage and lecture discusses the problem of declining of frog populations, the writer gives several methods to solve this problem. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articles, she said, non of these method offer solution for counter this declination.
First, the author states, pevent farmer from using pesticides becuase they are harmful to frog populations, since pesticides leading to sever breathing problem to frog. This point challenge by professor, She mentions, stop using pesticides cuases economic problem, because these pesticides kill insects which damage crops, there fore there is declination in the amount of crops if the farmers do not use pesticides.
Secondly, the writer of passage suggests using of medication to kill fungus which causees thickening of frog skin , moreover prevent them from breath, and die from dehydration. The lecturer rebutts this argument. She claim, treatment of fungus is not practical, furthermore need to treat each one individualy by cauch and capture each frog , this is cost and a complicated process, In addition the medicines do not pass to offsiprings, therefore this solution can not protect frog generations.
Finally, the author believe protection of frogs habitats in which they put their egges, like lakes and marshes to make them suitible for development will prevent frog declination. The professor in the other hand states, globle warm is the essential change thal cause decrease in frog poplulations, therefore prevent threatened of habitats by humen activity will never diminishe the declination of frog by globle warming.
The passage and lecture discusses the problem of declining of frog populations, the writer gives several methods to solve this problem. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articles, she said, non of these method offer solution for counter this declination.
First, the author states, pevent farmer from using pesticides becuase they are harmful to frog populations, since pesticides leading to sever breathing problem to frog. This point challenge by professor, She mentions, stop using pesticides cuases economic problem, because these pesticides kill insects which damage crops, there fore there is declination in the amount of crops if the farmers do not use pesticides.
Secondly, the writer of passage suggests using of medication to kill fungus which causees thickening of frog skin , moreover prevent them from breath, and die from dehydration. The lecturer rebutts this argument. She claim, treatment of fungus is not practical, furthermore need to treat each one individualy by cauch and capture each frog , this is cost and a complicated process, In addition the medicines do not pass to offsiprings, therefore this solution can not protect frog generations.
Finally, the author believe protection of frogs habitats in which they put their egges, like lakes and marshes to make them suitible for development will prevent frog declination. The professor in the other hand states, globle warm is the essential change thal cause decrease in frog poplulations, therefore prevent threatened of habitats by humen activity will never diminishe the declination of frog by globle warming.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-25 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
- The readind passage and the lecture are both discussing declination of Torreya taxifoha trees in state of Florida The writer claims three solution to prodect these trees from declination However the lecturer contradicts author opinion She says ways mentio 71
- The passage and lecture about agnostids which were a group of marines animals which became extinct many years ago The writer claim that there are three theories about how agnostids ate and how they may lived The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in artic 60
- The main idea i both reading passage and lecture is presence of bees on earth before 200 million years ago The skeptics in passage claims there were no bees in that time They give several arguments to support their claim However the lecturer refutes these 60
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about declination of liiterature reader in these days The passage claims there are several negative effect by reducing in reading literature The lecturer in the other hand casts dout in claim made in articl 71
- In our wold there are many celebrities and famous people who have their opnion that may influance others around them The question is whether those celebrities more important for young people than older or not This can be weighed in many aspects Admittedly 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture discusses the pr...
^^^^
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng of frog populations, the writer gives several methods to solve this problem. T...
^^
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this method' or 'these methods'?
Suggestion: this method; these methods
...laim made in articles, she said, non of these method offer solution for counter this declina...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...solution for counter this declination. First, the author states, pevent farmer ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: therefore
...icides kill insects which damage crops, there fore there is declination in the amount of c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... if the farmers do not use pesticides. Secondly, the writer of passage suggests...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...us which causees thickening of frog skin , moreover prevent them from breath, and ...
^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
...The lecturer rebutts this argument. She claim, treatment of fungus is not practical, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dividualy by cauch and capture each frog , this is cost and a complicated process,...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion can not protect frog generations. Finally, the author believe protection o...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es to make them suitible for development will prevent frog declination. The profe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46963562753 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80407001774 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611336032389 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8188131285 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.111111111 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4444444444 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430747425403 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205777649267 0.0996497079465 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.205496188188 0.0662205650399 310% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308854646551 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.320151033944 0.0443174109184 722% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.8541721854 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.