manuscript
Here, the article and the lecture both are about Voynich manuscript where there are many doubts about its original content and meaning. The article claims that this Voynich manuscript which has been written by unknown person and it is difficult to decode the script content. In the lecture, the professor challenges this claims made by the article. he thinks that this is completely original manuscript. He is of the opinion that this Voynich manuscript is really resembles from fifteenth and sixteenth century.
To began with, the article avers that the manuscript is on some scientific or magical subject which has been composed of complex secret code. This specific explanation is refuted by professor by arguing that it may have some powerful content with special code method but it dose not mean that it is completely true. He thinks that Ascham's book on medical plants may have similar manuscript but it also contains his original ideas and knowledge which has been elaborately coded in the book.
Secondly, the article suggests that This manuscript might be fake and it has no real text with meaning. It may just pretend as books of magical secrets to sell wealthy noble. The professor, however, rebuts this by mentioning that it was not that hard to make fool of sixteenth century people. Instead of making it really complex, he can do which is suited and necessary to earn money. Besides, he was rich enough so this theory would not be perfectly fit.
Finally, the article posits that this manuscript is modern fake created by wilfrid him self in order to receive attractive offer. In, the lecture, the professor’s position is that it is not possible because waller pages and ink both can be validate by technique where it can decide the date and how old they are. Since, dealer have knowledge, he can fix and get this much old pages but he can not find old ink. So, this theory can not be correct.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | Zmx_109 | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | zaid | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 81 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | lucy_Taiwan | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | _sta | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...lenges this claims made by the article. he thinks that this is completely original...
^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doses'?
Suggestion: doses
...content with special code method but it dose not mean that it is completely true. He...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 22.412803532 201% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86280487805 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48639217422 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533536585366 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.380546559 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8235294118 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233666411441 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950737247009 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104988337143 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155914210767 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932304381953 0.0443174109184 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.