In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. 阿里巴巴-钻石戒指,品质时尚新品,助你销量翻倍! 广告 阿里巴巴-钻石戒指,个性时尚,款式多样,支持私人订制,,帮您开启致富人生! 查看详情 > 2 This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong. Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to “shine”, to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team’s overall results can be more far-‐reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.
The author and the reading are both about assigning tasks to groups instead of an individual. The writer feels that companies can benefit such an approach since a group have wider range of abilities compared to each participant. The listening however, challenges points made by the reading by giving an example of a company which observes how groups pursue goals comparing to individuals.
To begin with, the writer argues a group can take in more risks as a consequence of shared responsibility and come up with novel ideas. These new solutions can speed up the process. This specific argument is challenged by the speaker. He claims a group need more time to achieve a unanimous agreement which results in repeated occurrence of meetings with no out put.
Secondly, the article states working coherently as a group can be rewarding for each individual, it is mentioned influential ones can lead a whole group and coherently they feel better since there is no one to order them. The speaker however, rebut this idea by pointing a fact about blind acceptance of their guidance. These people might make wrong decisions but since they have the influence others will follow them even if some employees with foresight warn them. They are ignored because of their lack of influence. This idea is elaborated even more by mention the fact that everyone are blamed while only a few where leaders.
Finally, the author posits that each member can be more prosperous. Moreover, the writing mentions the impact in much greater since the awards of a group is by far better than what a sole person can achieve. in contrast the lecturer's position is that some people can get a free ride while others are working. He notes that, the achievements of these category annihilates incentives of hard working members. The less contribution of these people causes the loss of enthusiasm in others.
- In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely t 80
- A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper surface curved to focus 81
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks, so they called t 80
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...abilities compared to each participant. The listening however, challenges points ma...
^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing for each individual, it is mentioned influential ones can lead a whole group ...
^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will follow them even if some employees with foresight warn them. They are ignor...
^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...er than what a sole person can achieve. in contrast the lecturers position is that...
^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...than what a sole person can achieve. in contrast the lecturers position is that some peo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this category' or 'these categories'?
Suggestion: this category; these categories
...ing. He notes that, the achievements of these category annihilates incentives of hard working ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95569620253 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65490109793 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598101265823 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2861878692 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1176470588 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129973421076 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389928425923 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369261538297 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784592803112 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216026405624 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.