TPO-02 - Integrated Writing TaskIn many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people

Essay topics:

TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task

In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge,expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.

Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to “shine”, to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team’s overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.

The reading passage states that group work is beneficial for successful completion of a project and presents some argument in support of the claim. However, the speaker in the lecture casts doubt on the reasons showed in the article. he mentions some solid cases to disprove all of them.

First and foremost, the author argues that a group of people has wider range of knowledge, expertise and skill which is required to make successful completion of a project.The lecturer, on the other hand, points out that if a large group of people works in a single project, not all the members have same contribution to the project. In addition, a member puts great effort than any other members in the team but doesn't receive any recognition , which, in turns degrade his motivation. Thus, this is not a good reason.

Secondly, the writer believes that a group of people can work very quickly. The lecturer states that when a project is assigned to a large group of people , it always takes time to start. because, lots of meetings are needed to be held among the members as well as lots of arguments, which , in turns, delay the project. Hence, this arguments lacks coherence.

Thirdly, the writer contends that sometimes creative solution comes from a group of people because they can take the risk. The lecturer states that highly creative works might not work. because, not all the members of the group are of same calibre. As a result it may frustrate some group members, which is not good for work environment. So, the arguments is not effective one.

fourthly, the writer argues that who loves leadership, he must feel better to work in a team. The lecturer states that members of that group dont take it positively.In addition , he adds that not all the members dont take same responsibility. Consequently, when project fails, blame comes to on all the members.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-03 sefeliz 76 view
2023-07-13 M. MEHRABI KERMANI 75 view
2023-06-21 宋致遠 view
2023-06-14 Simin_MB 65 view
2022-10-31 John7A7 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mbabar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...t on the reasons showed in the article. he mentions some solid cases to disprove a...
^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...make successful completion of a project.The lecturer, on the other hand, points out...
^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tribution to the project. In addition, a member puts great effort than any other ...
^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... than any other members in the team but doesnt receive any recognition , which, in tur...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... team but doesnt receive any recognition , which, in turns degrade his motivation....
^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t is assigned to a large group of people , it always takes time to start. because,...
^^
Line 9, column 189, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...people , it always takes time to start. because, lots of meetings are needed to be held...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 290, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...bers as well as lots of arguments, which , in turns, delay the project. Hence, thi...
^^
Line 9, column 329, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...h , in turns, delay the project. Hence, this arguments lacks coherence. Thirdly...
^^^^
Line 13, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...t highly creative works might not work. because, not all the members of the group are o...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t highly creative works might not work. because, not all the members of the group are o...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fourthly
...he arguments is not effective one. fourthly, the writer argues that who loves leade...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work in a team. The lecturer states that members of that group dont take it posit...
^^
Line 17, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...urer states that members of that group dont take it positively.In addition , he add...
^^^^
Line 17, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...s of that group dont take it positively.In addition , he adds that not all the mem...
^^
Line 17, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...roup dont take it positively.In addition , he adds that not all the members dont t...
^^
Line 17, column 214, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tion , he adds that not all the members dont take same responsibility. Consequently,...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, in addition, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8934169279 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60666406415 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510971786834 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.6968779483 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7222222222 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 4.19205298013 406% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374091791208 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104659096226 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735476122067 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205263736464 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768748114316 0.0443174109184 173% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.