"the method" in acting
The text is explaining “the Method” which is a method of acting to make the act of acting more realistic. The author brings some explanation of this method and explains how this method helps the actor to plays a more realistic role. But, the professor goes against the author and explains why the method is not the thing which actors must use.
First, the text explains that by “the Method”, actors can deeply go through the character they are playing and make the play more realistic. The text explains that actors must explore the subtext and discover how to structure emotion around conflicting emotions. On the other hand, the professor goes against this issue and says that, it is not the duty of actors to determine what they are playing, she says that, actors do not need to bring meaning to the subtext and they should just convey the message and do not need to discover and show the conflict of emotions.
Second, the text says that actors by using “The Method”, can go deep into the character and convey the message well, they need to analyze all specifics of a scene to play their role better. The professor refuses this point by saying that, actors depend on their own emotions even during acting, and sometimes they cannot go really deep into the character. She provides an example of a time when an actor must play a role of a murderer and says that in this fields actors cannot really go deep into the role.
Third, the text explains that in acting, there is no need for training of voice or movements and actors must live the part to make their acting realistic. The professor refutes this issue and says that, actors need lots of training and they need to be trained to be able to convey the message through their face, body or voice. The professor also says that, actors must learn about body language, their body movement or dance. Also, the professor adds this point that going too deep in a role is not good. for instance, she provides an example of an actor who did not sleep for two days to be able to play his role better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-09 | nastaran1992 | 63 | view |
- the decline in the number of frogs and different ways which can save their population 73
- the things we learn from friends are more important than the things we learn from family 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- higher taxes on unhealthy behaviors 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y a role of a murderer and says that in this fields actors cannot really go deep int...
^^^^
Line 4, column 506, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...t going too deep in a role is not good. for instance, she provides an example of an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, third, well, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 371.0 270.72406181 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61185983827 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28302364139 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.407008086253 0.540411800872 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6681032469 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.214285714 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222032723098 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108769881957 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194361094351 0.0662205650399 294% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180517999822 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150003417536 0.0443174109184 338% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.