migration of Anasazi
The lecture and the reading passage both discuss about migration of Anasazi. In the lecture, however, the professor casts doubt on the reason of relocate of Anasazi was drought, which are described in the reading.
First of all, the lecturer argues that evidence from bones doesn't mean anything because it is common to eat insufficient food for Anasazi people. While the reading indicate that one of main reason for migration was can't get enough crops dew to arid condition of climate. To be more particular, according to lecture, it is easy to find bones of children which couldn't get enough nutritions.
Furthermore, in constrast to the claim in the reading passage that they blocked all the gate of their villages in order to come back after drought condition, the professor insists that there is no reason to they moved back to their origin places. If they so, at least, some people would back to the place but they did not.
Finally, according to the reading passage, most of Anasazi seemed to want make new village near the reilable water sources. However, the lecturer maintains that, not all the Anasazi settled near the place near river or resovoir. To be specific, some of Anasazi made their new home on the arid areas such as Arizona.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ecturer argues that evidence from bones doesnt mean anything because it is common to e...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...at one of main reason for migration was cant get enough crops dew to arid condition ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...is easy to find bones of children which couldnt get enough nutritions. Furthermore, in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, at least, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84579439252 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40243729417 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593457943925 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9575340068 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.7 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251433527387 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103887749024 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104500427053 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161284404191 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11887005181 0.0443174109184 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.