The Northern Land Bridge
The passage and lecture both discuss the Clovis-first theory. The reading supports the idea of this theory while the professor in the lecture points out different anomalies in the theory that opposes the claim made by the passage.
The reading mentions that the finds of Clovis tools that date far back supports the idea that Asian were the ones that first migrated. However, the professor points out the archaeological evidences which suggests that the tools found in different sites dated back to as far as 19000 years while the Clovis tools only date back to about 13000 years ago. The professor,thus, says that the dates do not correspond to the evidences.
In addition, the lecture also points out that the oldest remains found in different parts of the country don't resemble the remains of Native Americans, According to professor, the landmass was colonized by variety of people before the settlers through Beringia moved towards North America.
Finally, the speaker in the lecture provides the evidence of DNA samples. He refutes the Clovis-first theory discussed in passage by pointing out that the analysis showed that people from Siberia settled in North America about 40000 years ago, far back than the first Clovis settlers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...opposes the claim made by the passage. The reading mentions that the finds of Clov...
^^^
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the ones that first migrated. However, the professor points out the archaeologi...
^^
Line 2, column 367, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , thus
... to about 13000 years ago. The professor,thus, says that the dates do not correspond ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...found in different parts of the country dont resemble the remains of Native American...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, thus, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 202.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14356435644 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50581619291 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529702970297 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0567972342 49.2860985944 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.