Productivity and Rewards
The passage and lecture both discuss about productivity and rewards. The reading states that reward system can increase productivity. However, the lecture explains that reward system actually reduces productivity and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the passage mentions that a behavior is likely to be repeated if a person is rewarded. On the contrary, the lecture points out that the employees actually do not like being rewarded. The speaker explains that most of the workers want to be paid and given respect rather than being rewarded. The professor furthers his argument by pointing that there is no control study that shows that reward system has long-term profit.
In addition, the reading claims that rewards and incentives improve the employee attitudes and productivity. The professor ,however, opposes this by saying that these types of incentives can instead make them feel as if they are being manipulated or controlled. According to the professor, the employees can be more disappointed by the
reward system as they might not be able to achieve the desired goal. The lecture even claims that the reward system can be counterproductive.
Finally, the reading states that reward system can be used to achieve remarkable results. However, the lecture claims that the employees might try to conceal their problems from the supervisors in order to achieve the reward. He argues that the employee will try to claim the reward even by compromising the overall benefit of the company. He says that this would in turn reduce the performance of the employee.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 86 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | mnm | 63 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | monigdc | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ttitudes and productivity. The professor ,however, opposes this by saying that the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, so, in addition, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.203125 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75173063441 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2293958802 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265032459162 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993705433144 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835431470447 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164937337332 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113741375814 0.0443174109184 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.