One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die
The lecture and the reading are both about a new invention to save endangered turtles which are accidentally trapped in shrimp nets and dead of lack of oxygen. This invention is called turtle excluder device (TED) and it can be incorporated into the nets. The writer criticised this method by giving three reasons. The lecturer argues those three reasons because she believes they are not adequate.
First of all, the reading mentions that the effectiveness of this equipment is small while its cost is high. Is is stated that one shrimp boat catches by accident one turtle every month but many of shrimps escape the nets due to the presence of TED. Besides, the installation cost of TED is expensive. The lecturer, however, disproves this idea. She asserts that there are thousands of shrimp boats working off the coast. As such, the amount of endangered turtles caught is huge in aggregate. Therefore, the problem is quite serious and TED is an effective way to tackle the issue.
Secondly, the author of the reading says that there are alternatives for TED like reducing the time limit that a shrimp boat is allowed to keep its net underwater. As the result, turtles can be released to breathe the air in due course. The lecturer, on the other hand, challenges this idea. She contends that the time limit method is only acceptable in theory. In real life conditions, it is impossible to reinforce this initiative because the authorities cannot monitor thousands of shrimp boats working in open sea.
Lastly, it is suggested in the reading that TED is not effective due to the fact that some turtles are too big to fit the size of TED. Therefore, they cannot escape the nets. The lecturer, however, rebuts this argument by telling of the flexibility of TED´s size. She notes that people can make the TED bigger without any issue. Thus, sizing is no longer a matter.
- TPO 37 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 38 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 42 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your 66
- TPO 39 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- preservation of old building 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ecture and the reading are both about a new invention to save endangered turtles which are ac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Is
...ipment is small while its cost is high. Is is stated that one shrimp boat catches by ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83850931677 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56425470333 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527950310559 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.599754918 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1904761905 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184286165813 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531573547553 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066055563302 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115044940157 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343793167261 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.