P. ramorum
The lecture and reading are both about P. ramorum. The author of reading feels that there are several methods of protecting the forest against the P. ramorum have been proposed. The lecturer challenges the claims made by author. He is of opinion that these methods have serious limitation, not practical and ineffective.
First, the author of reading argues that human helps with spread of spores of P. ramorum by hiking and biking trails. The article mentions that these spores help fungi to reproduce and we can prevent human from spreading those spores by wash their shoes and installing new bikes scrubbers on bicycle trails and that will be low cost to prevent the P.ramorum from spread. this specific argument is challenged by lecturer. He claims that precaution has little manage for spreading P.ramorum. Additionally, he says that not only human participating in that spred, but also the rain water that washes and carry these spores along distances.
Secondly, the writer suggests that we can use fungicidal (fungi-killing) chemical. In the article, it is said that these chemicals stimulate the oak trees' natural defenses against the P. ramorum and reduce the likelihood that the oaks will be infected. The lecturer, however rebuts this by mentioning that these chemical injections are effective for few months and then they need to be reinject again. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that to imagine a forest and thousands of trees in there and need to be reingect every few months that will take a lot of effort and cost a lot of money.
Finally, the author posits that we can fight the P. ramorum by practicing the clear-cutting. Moreover, the article stated that cutting or burning will involve the seemingly the healthy vegetation that surround the oaks and that because even there is no sign of infection on some trees they are infected. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that it is not making sence to cut the healthy vegetation, because some are rare like in west of united states. He notes that if we cut the rare vegetation it will be difficult to grow back easily and that will hurt the ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | MA KUNG TING | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-17 | nikki07hung | 68 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...inst the P. ramorum have been proposed. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...t to prevent the P.ramorum from spread. this specific argument is challenged by lect...
^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the P. ramorum and reduce the likelihood that the oaks will be infected. The lect...
^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the seemingly the'. Did you mean 'seemingly the'?
Suggestion: seemingly the
...ed that cutting or burning will involve the seemingly the healthy vegetation that surround the oa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 22.412803532 205% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90883977901 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59344602261 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522099447514 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.5394716906 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.619047619 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2380952381 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222780543302 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853226566011 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14447571294 0.0662205650399 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141866277059 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067510714586 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.