The passage and lecture are both disccuse the replacement of internal - combution engine used to produce power for cars by fuel cell engines that used hydrogen instead of petroleum, writer of passage elaborates to three advantages of using hydrogen to creat electricity. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article, she says, it is correct that petroleum has a lot of problems but hyrogen is not material to replace disel fuel.
First, author mention that cell- engines fuel are easlily available and derived from many resources. This point challenged by lecturer, She states, hydrogen used for fuel should be in a pure liquid form, in addition, it is difficult to maintain hydrogen in this state, furthermore we need a very low tempreture lab to keep hydrogen in liquid form.
Second, the writer of passage argues, fuel -cell engine produce only water as byproducts, thetrefore it is safer to environment than boiling of oil which give carbone dioxide as byproduct that causes world pollution problem. This argument rebutted by professor, she says, producing hydrogen need purification of water by burning of coal and oil, so these process deliver a high a mount of carbon dioxide since will harm the environment .
Finally, the author mentions, however, the fuel -cell engins will become economically competitive becuase, cars used hydrogen as a power requires half the fuel energy that internat- combustion cars need. The professor in the other hand claims, producing of pure hydrogen m=need a lot of cost equipement and many difficalt processes, in addition to the highly cost metals that used in these processes.
The passage and lecture are both disccuse the replacement of internal - combution engine used to produce power for cars by fuel cell engines that used hydrogen instead of petroleum, writer of passage elaborates to three advantages of using hydrogen to creat electricity. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article, she says, it is correct that petroleum has a lot of problems but hyrogen is not material to replace disel fuel.
First, author mention that cell- engines fuel are easlily available and derived from many resources. This point challenged by lecturer, She states, hydrogen used for fuel should be in a pure liquid form, in addition, it is difficult to maintain hydrogen in this state, furthermore we need a very low tempreture lab to keep hydrogen in liquid form.
Second, the writer of passage argues, fuel -cell engine produce only water as byproducts, thetrefore it is safer to environment than boiling of oil which give carbone dioxide as byproduct that causes world pollution problem. This argument rebutted by professor, she says, producing hydrogen need purification of water by burning of coal and oil, so these process deliver a high a mount of carbon dioxide since will harm the environment .
Finally, the author mentions, however, the fuel -cell engins will become economically competitive becuase, cars used hydrogen as a power requires half the fuel energy that internat- combustion cars need. The professor in the other hand claims, producing of pure hydrogen m=need a lot of cost equipement and many difficalt processes, in addition to the highly cost metals that used in these processes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-03 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
- The reading passage and lecture about buzzing which is a type of advertising of priducts Writer of the passage points that buzzing shuold be banned The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He says critics about buzzing are missleading First Autho 83
- The reading passage and lecture are both about online encyclopedias The authors claim a several problems of online encyclopedias that make them less valuble than traditional printed type The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articles She states non of 73
- The reading passage and lecture about farming of wild tuna the readind passage claims there are several problems faced tuna farming Th lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He has contraversal ideas To begin with the author states femal tuna do no 80
- The passage and lecture are about the benefites of avocados the writer of passage gives three advantages of avocados The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He states the benefits which are given in article are not realy correct First the author 81
- Working hard is the crucial way for succide so whether working with a group team is better than working alone or not this can be wieged in many aspects In my perceptive I concur with working as a team to success In the followind paraghraph I will elaborat 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both disccus...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is not material to replace disel fuel. First, author mention that cell- engines...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lab to keep hydrogen in liquid form. Second, the writer of passage argues, fu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... professor, she says, producing hydrogen need purification of water by burning of...
^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... dioxide since will harm the environment . Finally, the author mentions, ho...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xide since will harm the environment . Finally, the author mentions, however, t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17870722433 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70525246261 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608365019011 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9968111207 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.25 110.228320801 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.875 21.698381199 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.561377367337 0.272083759551 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235603592377 0.0996497079465 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.286028154974 0.0662205650399 432% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339516598224 0.162205337803 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.257932436184 0.0443174109184 582% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.3589403974 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.