The passage and lecture are discussing the possibility of using stars as navigation by humpback whales. The author claims, there are evidence explain that humpback use stars for navigation. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, these evidences are incorrect.
First, the writer states, humpback whales are intelligent enough to use stars as navigation because their brain exceed that of other animals. The professor challenges this, she says, there is no exact relationship between intelligent and using stars for navigation, she illustrates to many animals with low intelligent ability and can use stars as navigation, she points out to dogs which have quit little intelligent, however, they can use stars for navigation.
Second, the author argues, humpback immigrate in straight line, moreover, animals can maintain movement in a straight direction for long distance by orient themselves by external objects like stars. This argument is rebutted by professor, she suggests, the straight immigration depend on magnetic force from earth which effect bio-magnetic field in animal’ brain, therefore, there is no connection between straight immigration of whales and navigation.
Finally, the author elaborates on spy-hopping behavior exhibit in straight up floating of whale and their head upward to see stars to provide them with information to navigate by. In the other hand, the lecturer states, there are many animals do spy-hopping behavior but they do not immigrate, she mentions sharks that use this behavior to find food, therefore the spy- hopping of whale is not indication of using star as navigation.
The passage and lecture are discussing the possibility of using stars as navigation by humpback whales. The author claims, there are evidence explain that humpback use stars for navigation. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, these evidences are incorrect.
First, the writer states, humpback whales are intelligent enough to use stars as navigation because their brain exceed that of other animals. The professor challenges this, she says, there is no exact relationship between intelligent and using stars for navigation, she illustrates to many animals with low intelligent ability and can use stars as navigation, she points out to dogs which have quit little intelligent, however, they can use stars for navigation.
Second, the author argues, humpback immigrate in straight line, moreover, animals can maintain movement in a straight direction for long distance by orient themselves by external objects like stars. This argument is rebutted by professor, she suggests, the straight immigration depend on magnetic force from earth which effect bio-magnetic field in animal’ brain, therefore, there is no connection between straight immigration of whales and navigation.
Finally, the author elaborates on spy-hopping behavior exhibit in straight up floating of whale and their head upward to see stars to provide them with information to navigate by. In the other hand, the lecturer states, there are many animals do spy-hopping behavior but they do not immigrate, she mentions sharks that use this behavior to find food, therefore the spy- hopping of whale is not indication of using star as navigation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-08 | talelaldabous | 80 | view |
| 2021-02-21 | talelaldabous | 80 | view |
- The passage and lecture are both about possibilty of fying and flapping of Pterosaurs dinosaure The author claims several reasons to explain why Ptersaurs did not fly The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article and contradacts these reasons First 60
- The reading passage and the lecturer are both discussing dedicated to uncovering and studying old culture artifacts in The United Kingdom The writer claims serious problems and limitations in Britain to study these artifacts However the lecturer casts dou 68
- The reading passage and lecture talk about type of fungus called Phytophthora which detected in forest of USA these fungus infects trees and cause serious damage to oak trees The author claims three methods to protect the forests The lecturer casts doubt 70
- The passage and lecture about cheatgrass which is an invasive species of grass these grass cause damage to the animal habitats and drive out other native plants in north American field The writer claims there are three methods to solve the probles get fro 80
- The reading and lecture about the working four days a week instead of five days a week The author beileives that four days work a week is good option The lecturer casts doubts on the claim made in the article He thinks that full time work is better First 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...that humpback use stars for navigation. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntions, these evidences are incorrect. First, the writer states, humpback whale...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er, they can use stars for navigation. Second, the author argues, humpback immi...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... immigration of whales and navigation. Finally, the author elaborates on spy-ho...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...indication of using star as navigation.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.01324503311 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51383399209 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84451000522 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.3261439893 49.2860985944 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466026433842 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220292425379 0.0996497079465 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152674487944 0.0662205650399 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321127008508 0.162205337803 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.264699969052 0.0443174109184 597% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.