The passage and lecture both discuss genetically modified trees. The author claims tree benefits from tree that modified genetically. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. She states it is not obvious, there is any benefits from this method of growing.
First, the writer points out, genetically treated trees are harder than normally planting trees. They survive longer, Furthermore more resistant to virus. The professor in the other hand contradicts this notion. She mentions, normal trees less resistant to virus, but not all trees effected by disease. although, many trees may die after effected by virus, other which are not can survive and reproduction. But all Genetically modified trees effected by disease, therefor they completly die.
Second, the author states, genetically modified tree grow faster than normal trees. Farmer can get economic benefits from them. This statement is challenged by professor. She elaborate on high cost of seeds of genetically treated trees. More over, farmer have to pay for companies each time when planting these trees.
Finally, the passage suggests, genetically modified trees prevent overexplotation of wild trees. This is due to fast grow of these trees to use in firewood or for building. So they decrease demand on normal wild trees. The professor refutes this argument. She says.
The passage and lecture both discuss genetically modified trees. The author claims tree benefits from tree that modified genetically. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. She states it is not obvious, there is any benefits from this method of growing.
First, the writer points out, genetically treated trees are harder than normally planting trees. They survive longer, Furthermore more resistant to virus. The professor in the other hand contradicts this notion. She mentions, normal trees less resistant to virus, but not all trees effected by disease. although, many trees may die after effected by virus, other which are not can survive and reproduction. But all Genetically modified trees effected by disease, therefor they completly die.
Second, the author states, genetically modified tree grow faster than normal trees. Farmer can get economic benefits from them. This statement is challenged by professor. She elaborate on high cost of seeds of genetically treated trees. More over, farmer have to pay for companies each time when planting these trees.
Finally, the passage suggests, genetically modified trees prevent overexplotation of wild trees. This is due to fast grow of these trees to use in firewood or for building. So they decrease demand on normal wild trees. The professor refutes this argument. She says.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-30 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2021-06-30 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The passage and lecture are about the presence of fossilized trees in Arizona since 200 million years old The writer claims these fossilized structures not for bees he gave several arguments The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article She states 76
- The passage and lecture are bouth talking about Guackers which emits in Russian word frog sound The passage claim several reason which cause the odd of this sound The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She suggests there is a problem with each 66
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about glass building material these building may injury birds because they cannot distinguish between glass and air space The author gives three solutions to treat this problem The lecture casts doubt on cl 60
- World today faces a lot of changes in all parts of life The question is whether this guick change make people less or more happy This will be weighed in many different aspects Admittedly some believe development which happened in our society make them les 70
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about declination of liiterature reader in these days The passage claims there are several negative effect by reducing in reading literature The lecturer in the other hand casts dout in claim made in articl 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture both discuss gen...
^^
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ts from tree that modified genetically. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in t...
^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are any benefits'?
Suggestion: there are any benefits
... article. She states it is not obvious, there is any benefits from this method of growing. First, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
... but not all trees effected by disease. although, many trees may die after effected by v...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disease, therefor they completly die. Second, the author states, genetically m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37735849057 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62801472107 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3004291806 49.2860985944 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.0 110.228320801 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.1578947368 21.698381199 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.78947368421 7.06452816374 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519089275509 0.272083759551 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152317401135 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143204919449 0.0662205650399 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367662200378 0.162205337803 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.292176461219 0.0443174109184 659% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.74 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.