The passage discusses a painting which is said that is a painting of a well know artist Jane Austen and provides some reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the professor provides his own reasons and explains why he is against all claims in the text.
The passage discusses a painting which is said that is a painting of a well know artist Jane Austen and provides some reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the professor provides his own reasons and explains why he is against all claims in the text.
Firstly, the text says that the painting is endorsed by Austen family and it can prove that this painting is exactly a picture of her which her family gave permission to use it as a portrait of her. The professor refutes this claim by saying that, the first time which the painting was authorized was 70 years after Austen's death and the people who endorsed this painting had never seen her in real, so we cannot be sure that the painting belongs to her and has endorsed exactly.
Secondly, the text claims that all details of Jane's face in the painting is clearly like the sketch which her sister, Cassandra, made and the painting clearly resembles the sketch. The professor goes against this point and says that, this painting may be for a relative of Jane. He states that Jane had a large family and this painting may be the picture of one of her cousins or one of the teenagers in her large family.
Thirdly, the passage explains that however we cannot see any date or sign on the picture, but there are some good evidences which prove that this painting is made by Humphrey who is probably the painter who Jane's family may hire, and also he was active during the time Jane was a teenager exactly like the girl in the picture. However, the professor casts doubt on this claim and refutes it by saying that the only reason we can say this picture is made by this painter is based on the style of the painting and also based on the stamp on the back of the painting, we can be sure that these stamps was available when Jane was 27 not a teenager, why so William leg who sold these stamps just sold them when Jane was an adult not a teenager.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-18 | saeedpanahi | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | nastaran1992 | 68 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 22.412803532 201% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 355.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40281690141 5.08290768461 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17030142884 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43661971831 0.540411800872 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.577345705 49.2860985944 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.666666667 110.228320801 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.4444444444 21.698381199 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457734959353 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.253844728008 0.0996497079465 255% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.215781585809 0.0662205650399 326% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.387442831346 0.162205337803 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.339713730292 0.0443174109184 767% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.3589403974 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 12.2367328918 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.