In the past lecturers could teach a certain number of students in one lecture hall. With the development of new technology, it's hard to justify the reason to participate in the lecture physically and not via the Internet. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Before the information age, tutors have to deliver lectures to a group of students face to face; but now with the boom in IT advancement, it seems unnecessary for their physical presence. It is true that it is difficult for justifying the reasons to be present physically in such gatherings while there is an alternative option, the internet.
The primary reason for this is that the time flexibility of online classes. The scholars might schedule their own time to learn the subjects taught since the digitalized academic materials help the saving for reviewing it later. To illustrate, the tutors could either record their lessons and upload in YouTube or send links to tune email address or even post in students' common login page. These easily accessible options were not under limelight until the need of the internet.
Another connected reason is the possibility to reach many experts at one time. Even if the novice is about to attend the lecture directly, there is less chance for him to meet many educators at the same place but with recent application software like Google hangout, it has become facile to gather knowledge from different people of the same field of study.
To end, while there is a better option to choose from with the advent of technology, learners tend not to get inclined to other choices. Unless there is a mandatory need to get enrolled for the lectures in person, undoubtedly they prefer online classes. My personal view is that this way of updated learning has become more useful because of the ease provided to manage their time properly. Thus e-classrooms and tuitions are better to be preferred by the students of this modern era.
- In the past lecturers could teach a certain number of students in one lecture hall. With the development of new technology, it's hard to justify the reason to participate in the lecture physically and not via the Internet. Do you agree or disagree wi 86
- Where would you love to spend your free time, most people prefer to spend it indoor while others prefer to spend it outdoor. which would you prefer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 392, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...provided to manage their time properly. Thus e-classrooms and tuitions are better to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92932862191 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57631343253 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614840989399 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4423752441 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152076727666 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502009981592 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359751643164 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908108728102 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428699346728 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.