Peer to peer sharing
The reading selection and the professor discussed peer to peer sharing and it’s consequences. While the reading argues that this activity should be allowed, the lecturer disagrees with these perspective showing how this under fire activity affects us. Both reading and listening show these three main points: Music sales, legal or ilegal and artists consequences.
According to the passage, studies show that peer to peer downloading hasn’t negatively affect music sales, instead it has improved. However, the lecturer argues that music industry has suffered as a result of the decrease on CD sales and illegal music download.
The reading mentions that thanks to the “fair use” clause in the legislation, file shearing shouldn’t be considered a violation. Nevertheless, the lecture shows that music piracy is a form of steeling that shouldn’t be allowed because of its unregulated distribution.
As the text states, file sharing benefit artists who’s renege of explore increases, expanding their data base. On the other hand, the listening believes many artists are not receiving the credit they deserve for their work.
Generally speaking, although the reading and the lecture are both about peer to peer software and it’s benefits and disadvantages, the three main points in the passage are challenged by the lecturer by supporting her point of view with various studies. Now you have been presented with all the facts you can make your own conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this perspective' or 'these perspectives'?
Suggestion: this perspective; these perspectives
...be allowed, the lecturer disagrees with these perspective showing how this under fire activity af...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, nevertheless, so, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46086956522 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75391455362 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617391304348 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5876622167 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.181818182 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256660839969 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106511782971 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180623068549 0.0662205650399 273% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123529258846 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852542700942 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.