Peer to peer software
File sharing
Music piracy
The reading selection and the professor discussed peer-to-peer sharing and it’s consequences. While the reading argues that this activity should be allowed, the lecturer disagrees with this perspective showing how this activity affects us. Both reading and listening show these three main points: Music sales, legal or ilegal and artists consequences.
According to the passage, studies show that peer-to-peer downloading hasn’t negatively affect music sales, instead it has improved. However, the lecturer argues that music industry has suffered as a result of the decrease on CD sales and illegal music download.
The reading mentions that thanks to the “fair use” clause in the legislation, file shearing shouldn’t be considered a violation. Nevertheless, the lecture shows that music piracy is a form of steeling that shouldn’t the be allowed because of its unregulated distribution.
As the text states, file sharing benefit artists who’s renege of explore increases, expanding their data base. On the other hand, the listening believes much artists are not receiving the credit they deserve for their work.
Generally speaking, although the reading and the lecture are both about peer-to-peer software and it’s benefits and disadvantages, the three main points in the passage are challenged by the lecturer by supporting her point of view with various studies. Now you have been presented with all the facts you can make your own conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... download. The reading mentions that thanks to the “fair use” clause in the l...
^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acy is a form of steeling that shouldn’t the be allowed because of its unregulate...
^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...y is a form of steeling that shouldn’t the be allowed because of its unregulated dist...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... the other hand, the listening believes much artists are not receiving the credit th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lecturer by supporting her point of view with various studies. Now you have been ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, nevertheless, so, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62780269058 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86407750147 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627802690583 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4845845204 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.090909091 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322586756506 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109673820438 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112161946722 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145089086209 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627497450839 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.