Plan Urban Forest - Integrated Essay
The passage and the lecture are both about a plan to protect the urban forests. The reading brings up three main points to consider while the speaker disapproves all of these points by explaining the reason why they failed in the past.
First of all, the author of the passage claims that mature trees should be protected by law because they could get harmed by the urbanization and industrial zones. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this idea by stating that in the past, the law wasn’t as efficient as they thought, due to the fact that it was barely understandable and wasn’t applied properly.
Secondly, the author posits it’s totally necessary the support of the community to protect the trees. Thus, it’s essential to allocate an adequate budget for the conservation trees planted in parks and city streets, thereby for activities such as adopting a tree and memorial trees. However, the professor refutes this specific argument, insomuch in the past low funds were recollected from private fund. Although, she proposes that the maintenance could be done with volunteer work.
Finally, the last point is public campaigns to educate the local residents in order to persuade them to act for the benefits of the forests. In contrast, the lecturer indicates that most campaigns expose vague information that isn’t directly beneficial for the individual. Therefore, she suggests that in the public campaigns must be emphasized how executing this plan would help the community to have better golf parks and cleaner parks.
- Urban Forest Plan Integrated section 47
- Emperor penguins Integrated section 61
- Stonehenge 3
- Leglisation would have to include a tempmorary moratorium in devolpment in areas where mature trees would me harmed and ordinances that would protect and nurture trees currently growing on indsutrial institutional and rsidential land Support to mantain an 80
- Although it s a new technology solar energy provides benefits to the entire world First solar energy eliminates our reliance on non renewable fossil fuels Additionally solar energy is non pollutant which makes it better for everyone Finally there is almos 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'explained'.
Suggestion: explained
...o maintain the trees. In the article is explain that an adequate budget should be alloc...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ree, planting trees and memorial trees. Although, the lecturer stand in firm opposition ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the man in the listening passage.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, likewise, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19217081851 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83338392872 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5871886121 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7251389614 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2666666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0634964866727 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237197299642 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551061895374 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0364496325097 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458607124798 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.