professor's appearance on TV show.
Both the reading and lecture are related with the appearance of professor on Television. The reading claims that presence of university professor is beneficial for both the professor him/herself and for the university also by mentioning three main reasons. However, the lecturer opposes the passage’s claim by refuting all the reasons.
First, the article states that the professor’s appearance on TV helps to increase his/her reputation among the scholars. This assists him to get invitation from conference and this also helps him/her to get fund for doing research. The lecturer contends this by saying that for discussing on TV show, it does not require any depth knowledge and it creates negative image among other scholars about the professor, who appears on TV.
Second, the reading claims that the presence of professor on TV increases the reputation of university for which s/he works. This helps the student to get more donations and attract more students to get their admission at the university. But the lecturer opposes this point by saying that the professor needs to waste so much time to be prepared for the show and s/he also spends time for travelling, which the professor have to adjust from his university time. This hampers his lectures in the university.
Finally, the reading argues that common people also benefited by the presence of professor on TV show. The people can talk with the expert directly, which increases their knowledge. However, the lecturer refutes this point by saying that it does not require any depth understanding of any subject to discuss on TV show. Even, a TV reporter can discuss on this issue by doing enough homework.
- Formation of team for completing a project 73
- Some prefer to eat at restaurants, while other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. 66
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- zoos role and endangered species 78
- Altruistic behaviour of people and animals. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os;s claim by refuting all the reasons. First, the article states that the profe...
^^^
Line 4, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on this issue by doing enough homework.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1496350365 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75589980765 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481751824818 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9511337143 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2877003681 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111531665329 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102048853551 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190607510417 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548910336077 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.