Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in the world. These television appearances are of great benefit to the professors themselves as well as to their universities and the general public.
The author of the reading passage argues that the appearance of a professor on TV is highly beneficial to the professor, the university the professor is from, and the general public. It went further to provide three reasons to support this claim. However, the lecture explains that no one benefits from professors appearing on TV, and refutes each of the grounds presented in the passage.
First, the reading claims that by appearing on TV, the professor acquires a reputation as being an authority within his field. The lecture, however, refutes this point by stating that when a professor appears on TV, he is seen as someone who is not a serious scholar and as one who is interested in entertaining rather than educating. It also states such view of the professor would reduce the research grants available to him.
Furthermore, the article says that having a university professor appear on TV is beneficial for the university, as the university receives positive publicity. Nevertheless, the lecture opposes this by stating that performing on TV takes time away from the professor. Hence, the professor would not be able to satisfy the time requirements to attend to all his students and would be of enormous disadvantage to the university.
Finally, the reading states that the public gains enormously, as they get expert information when exposed to professors on TV. The lecture discredits this point by explaining that TV networks do not want severe intellectual education, and TV viewers are not attracted to highly learned contents. Hence, what a professor is expected to deliver on TV, a serious TV presenter will deliver the same, after proper research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-08 | predatoros | 86 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | KnockingOn | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 75 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | John7A7 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 54
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas in which the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permi 50
- In the past eating avocados was not considered to be necessarily beneficial Being unaware of their beneficial properties people used them mostly as avocado oil for different purposes It wasn t until recently that the advantages of consuming avocados were 75
- As we progress into the 21st century educational opportunities are expanding Some students have found great success in studying online at their own pace Other students prefer a more traditional education in a typical school building Which manner of studyi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...iversity the professor is from, and the general public. It went further to provide three reaso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13186813187 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90754362415 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534798534799 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3503585381 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147227936029 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063429034465 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321927131255 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100060209167 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120766843543 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.