protect forests and keep the deforestation process in check
The reading passage suggests three methods in order to protect forests and keep the deforestation process in check. Nevertheless, the lecturer finds the suggestions flawed. He further casts doubt on the suggestions and refutes them all with thorough explanations.
First, the author puts forth the idea that supporting forest agriculture can positively affect the condition of forests. The professor, however, dismisses this idea. He states that forest agriculture is itself a force against forests, for they make use of modern practices like utilizing ferilizers and pesitcides. Moreover, forest agriculture adds waste material and pollution to the environment. As a result it is not a good idea to cease deforestation.
Furthermore, the passage contends that aiding the habitants of villages and communities located in forests with finance can help keep the forests, because if so, they will resist converting the forest land into industialized sites. In contrast, the professor finds this idea dubuous. He mentions that these funds will eventually go to the forest owners rather that villagers. Consequently, the residents of forest lands will not benefit the fund and will not resist the pressure. So this idea will not appropriately help protect the forests.
Finally, the passage asserts that using governmental funds to establish protected forest areas is the best measure against deforestation. However, the lecturer is not in favor of this idea. He states that such intentionally planted trees will be for commercial purposes, so it does not anything to do with the goal of the funding. As a result he opposes this idea profoundly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-15 | zahra.tmmm | 60 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
| 2018-10-31 | cubamiami2009 | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 90
- effectiveness of tree devices 83
- summarize the point in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points in the passage. 3
- do you agree or disagree that in the past younger people rely on their parents to make decision for them, and today the are more able to make decision independently 73
- if in a speech the speaker say something wrong you will choose to interrupt him or wait until the end of the speech 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...erial and pollution to the environment. As a result it is not a good idea to cease...
^^
Line 4, column 331, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing to do with the goal of the funding. As a result he opposes this idea profoundl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4296875 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01257739462 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.2553760205 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7647058824 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0588235294 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245948272811 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072916163384 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134319468695 0.0662205650399 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150365594162 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981942066408 0.0443174109184 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.