Protection of Torreya taxifoha
Both the reading article and lecture discusses about the possible measures that can be adopted to protect declining population of Torreya taxifoha. Whilst the author suggests three effective measures, the speaker is at odds with authors claim. In her opinion, none of the suggested measures are likely to be efficacious for several reasons which will be discussed in the following paragraphs.
The author, in the reading, beings my mentioning that maintaining the Torreya population in their suitable climate, typical cooler and damper microclimate of the northern part of Florida, would be very beneficial; however, the lecturer confutes the proposition made by author. She argues that reestablishment is highly unlikely to achieve the feat of success: the change in the climate of the larger region, specifically increase in temperature, is observed. She feels that the reason may be due to global warming and draining of wetland. Thus, the considered temperature cannot be maintained which falsifies the authors claim.
The writer further mentions another problem solution by migrating the Torreya plant sees to further norther part of Florida, since it was believed that such plant survived and thrived in the pervious time. The speaker challenges the position made by the writer by mentioning similar experiment done on Black Locus tree. She posits that when the particular tree was taken to the northern part, it embraced the environment and developed rapidly. As a result, the nearby plants, on the verge of extinction, were destroyed to a great extent. Thus, she feels the same happening of events with Torreya.
The reading article, finally, presents third possible solution: relocation of the Torreya seeds in the research centers. As opposed to the articles argument, the lecturer affirms that those seeds will not be able to withstand against the various diseases in those research centers. She maintains that such plants necessitate large seeds and genetically diversity in their forms which is not probable in the research centers. So, the implementation of the idea will fail.
To summarize, the writer and speaker both holds an opposite views on the possible protection measures for diminishing population of Torreya taxifoha which creates difficulty for both of them on finding common ground.
- Problems in Protecting Wild Tauna 52
- Protection of Torreya taxifoha 80
- Protection of Forest Through International Fund 80
- Endothermic Dinosaurs 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend money on salaries university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
...the research centers. As opposed to the articles argument, the lecturer affirms that tho...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, so, third, thus, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1373.03311258 143% => OK
No of words: 361.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43213296399 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7957755881 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 145.348785872 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567867036011 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 419.366225166 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4273718857 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.352941176 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183294164165 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522601248876 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917088311357 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10805437882 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784694282469 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 63.6247240618 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
...the research centers. As opposed to the articles argument, the lecturer affirms that tho...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, so, third, thus, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1373.03311258 143% => OK
No of words: 361.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43213296399 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7957755881 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 145.348785872 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567867036011 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 419.366225166 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4273718857 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.352941176 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183294164165 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522601248876 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917088311357 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10805437882 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784694282469 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 63.6247240618 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.