Pruning technique in plant raising.
The reading text and lecture are both about the pruning of tree. The author of this article feel that pruning is important for the plant. the lecturer is dispute all this claim made by the author. He stats that, limited pruning is neccessary but, havy pruning is bad for the plant.
Firstly, according to reading text Pruning is mainintain the tree size.The author says that, by using the crown reduction pruning, we can maintain the tree size. In contrast, the lecture states that Sometimes, the bad and poor pruning of the plant is hazardeous for the plant. Additionally, he claim that by this technique we can not keep the plant small and plant attain it's maximum hight in few years.
Secondly, the author suggests that, pruning will keep the plant healthy. The reading passage posits that, under the pruning technique we will remove the small branches, which is suseptible to disease. On the other hand, the lecturer pointout that, Pruning is stressful operation for the plant. Moreover, he stance that, it will remove the major source of the food and it will affect the photosynthesis of the plant.
Finally, The reading text mention that, Pruning will maintain the natural shape and beauty of the tree. On the oppsite side, the lecturer says that, by this plant operation the plant can loose it's natural shape and wear of the ugly shape. On top of that, he says that, light pruning is beneficial for the plant, instead of the frequent chain saw pruning.
In conclusion, the reading text and lecturer are both about the pros and cons of the pruning. The lesturer is effectively manage to challange all the major points made by the author in this reading text.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-14 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
- People who are especially talented in solving problems that concern an understanding of space are said to have visual spatial intelligence a superior visual sense People with visual spatial intelligence are able to perceive patterns They will notice immed 81
- TPO62 85
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 3
- Pruning technique in plant raising 66
- Ingrate the author s view and lecturer s opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hat pruning is important for the plant. the lecturer is dispute all this claim made...
^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ext Pruning is mainintain the tree size.The author says that, by using the crown re...
^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
...ardeous for the plant. Additionally, he claim that by this technique we can not keep ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
..., by this plant operation the plant can loose its natural shape and wear of the ugly ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'managed'.
Suggestion: managed
...he pruning. The lesturer is effectively manage to challange all the major points made ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85017421603 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34634777596 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.540411800872 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 2.5761589404 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5050421514 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315179509237 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131255677455 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884019893597 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195723120821 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104400215561 0.0443174109184 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.