Pruning technique in plant raising.
The reading text and lecture are both about the pruning of tree. The author of this article feel that pruning is important for the plant. the lecturer disputes all this claim made by the author. He stats that, limited pruning is necessary but, heavy pruning is bad for the plant.
Firstly, according to reading text Pruning is maintain the tree size. The author says that, by using the crown reduction pruning, we can maintain the tree size. In contrast, the lecture states that Sometimes, the bad and poor pruning of the plant is hazardous for the plant. Additionally, he claims that by this technique we cannot keep the plant small and plant attain its maximum hight in few years.
Secondly, the author suggests that, pruning will keep the plant healthy. The reading passage posits that, under the pruning technique we will remove the small branches, which is susceptible to disease. On the other hand, the lecturer point out that, Pruning is stressful operation for the plant. Moreover, he stance that, it will remove the major source of the food and it will affect the photosynthesis of the plant.
Finally, the reading text mention that, Pruning will maintain the natural shape and beauty of the tree. On the opposite side, the lecturer says that, by this plant operation the plant can lose it's natural shape and wear of the ugly shape. On top of that, he says that, light pruning is beneficial for the plant, instead of the frequent chain saw pruning.
In conclusion, the reading text and lecturer are both about the pros and cons of the pruning. The lecturer is effectively manage to challenge all the major points made by the author in this reading text.``
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-14 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
- When archaeologists make an interesting discovery they often make overly ambitious claims about the value of their finds The case of the Archaeopteryx is a case in point The discovery of the first Archaeopteryx fossils made quite an impression on the fiel 3
- You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage Typically an effect 3
- TPO60 3
- TPO03 60
- Ingrate the author s view and lecturer s opinion 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hat pruning is important for the plant. the lecturer disputes all this claim made b...
^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'maintained'.
Suggestion: maintained
...y, according to reading text Pruning is maintain the tree size. The author says that, by...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'managed'.
Suggestion: managed
...he pruning. The lecturer is effectively manage to challenge all the major points made ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8850174216 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42657849932 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425087108014 0.540411800872 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 2.5761589404 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2432882304 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.4705882353 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310839843693 0.272083759551 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125541065136 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893577936314 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195865777467 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104629035439 0.0443174109184 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.