Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
The provided material are concerned with sea otters declining which are some small mammals lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. The author states that environmental pollution is the most likely cause for sea otters decreasing. In contrast, the lecturer repudiates this point through several counterarguments that are as follows.
Initially, the author says that environmental pollution is the more possible cause of declining, because of some known sources like oil rigs. The more industrial chemical pollution increase, the more sea otters will die. However, the lecturer explains that if any infection occurs in the seas, it will start killing all mammals and nobody can find any dead sea others there.
Second, the writer thinks that predators attacks are not possible as environmental pollution. owing to the fact that predators such as the orca prefer to hunt other whales instead of sea otters. Yet again, the lecturer explains that the orcas prefer to hunt whales, but nowadays those whales have been hunting be people, so orcas have to change their diets. They started hunting sea otters such as seals and sea lions and it is the viable reason for their dwindling.
The final point of contention between the article and lecture is the declining uneven pattern. The author says that at some Alaskan locations the amount of decreasing is much more than others. this occurs because of some environmental factors. On the other hand, the speaker explains that the uneven pattern reveals that this pattern relates to orcas accessibility. if orcas can easily access those location, the number of sea otters will decrease greatly. In shallow or rocky locations, the sea otters population have not declined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-08 | LKL | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | rosedudu | 3 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | mattayousak | 3 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | mattayousak | 3 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | iscaxap | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Owing
...ot possible as environmental pollution. owing to the fact that predators such as the ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...of decreasing is much more than others. this occurs because of some environmental fa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...pattern relates to orcas accessibility. if orcas can easily access those location,...
^^
Line 7, column 394, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this location' or 'those locations'?
Suggestion: this location; those locations
...cessibility. if orcas can easily access those location, the number of sea otters will decrease...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 497, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
... In shallow or rocky locations, the sea otters population have not declined.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2296819788 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58910069721 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551236749117 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5806091679 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0572560874622 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0201927405513 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319967193959 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0365912688369 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00370122679267 0.0443174109184 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.