The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about comuterize smart cars. The writer claims several benefits by using this type of cars. However, the professor casts doubt on claim made in article. She believes, using computerize cars is not clear beneficial.
First, the author states, smart cars will decrease roads accidents. He mentions, these cars have a good equipments like sensors. Moreover, they are automaticly programed. This statement is challenged by professor. She illustrates to accidents that might happen if these technology fell. There are many reasons that cause impairment of cars equipment. As a result, this benefit is not convincing.
In addition, the author asserts, using computerized cars will help to decrease traffic problems. These control cars can move behind each other smoothly. Therefore, it will be able to allow increasing highway speed. The lecture refutes this theory. She says, "historically research show that people can easilly get drive experience with time." On the other hand, there is no increase in experience when using smart cars. Cars are driven by technological devices, which can not improve awareness with time like human being.
Finally, the passage elaborates on decreasing in the cost of driving as aconsequent of using smart cars. The professor has the opposite idea. She thinks, the equipments which are used to make smart cars like sensors, and programed brakes are more expensive than money used for repair or change parts of an ordinary cars. Furthermore, when any part of a smart car is damaged, it is very expensive to replace it.
The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about comuterize smart cars. The writer claims several benefits by using this type of cars. However, the professor casts doubt on claim made in article. She believes, using computerize cars is not clear beneficial.
First, the author states, smart cars will decrease roads accidents. He mentions, these cars have a good equipments like sensors. Moreover, they are automaticly programed. This statement is challenged by professor. She illustrates to accidents that might happen if these technology fell. There are many reasons that cause impairment of cars equipment. As a result, this benefit is not convincing.
In addition, the author asserts, using computerized cars will help to decrease traffic problems. These control cars can move behind each other smoothly. Therefore, it will be able to allow increasing highway speed. The lecture refutes this theory. She says, "historically research show that people can easilly get drive experience with time." On the other hand, there is no increase in experience when using smart cars. Cars are driven by technological devices, which can not improve awareness with time like human being.
Finally, the passage elaborates on decreasing in the cost of driving as aconsequent of using smart cars. The professor has the opposite idea. She thinks, the equipments which are used to make smart cars like sensors, and programed brakes are more expensive than money used for repair or change parts of an ordinary cars. Furthermore, when any part of a smart car is damaged, it is very expensive to replace it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
- The reading passage and the lecture are disccusing regulations that United State should regulate establish to regulate handling of coal ash material and prevent their harmful damage by their chemical material The author claim several reasons to explain th 70
- The passage and lecture are both talking about declination of cedar population in North America The author claims several reason to explain causes of this declination the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He states these reasons are inadequed 60
- The government has plays important rule in enhancing welfare to the general public Whether the governments should fund money to improve internet access or to improve public transportations this can be evaluated in many aspects in my opinion I concur with 70
- The reading passage and the lecture are talking about agnostids which were a group of marine animals that become extincted and how these species lkived The writer claims several theories about how agnostids lived However the lecturer debates these therori 65
- The reading passage and lecture are both about benefits from working 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week the author claims three benefits from working 4 days a week for companies and employees The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article He co 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'equipment'?
Suggestion: equipment
...s. He mentions, these cars have a good equipments like sensors. Moreover, they are automa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
...rates to accidents that might happen if these technology fell. There are many reasons that cause...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, talking about, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30078125 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79180482741 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62890625 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 3.25607064018 369% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1780053062 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.619047619 110.228320801 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.1904761905 21.698381199 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473599002389 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127003972086 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984886996853 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317242996152 0.162205337803 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.216407309986 0.0443174109184 488% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.57 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 10.7273730684 37% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.