The reading passage and lecture are talking about silver coins that are discovered in the north America, the people believe the coin brought to these sites by European explorers called the Nores. The author claims that coin is not genuine historical evidence and it is fake. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article, she mentions that this coin has a genuine historical evidence.
First, the writer states, the coin present in area far away from the site that Nores settled in. The lecturer refutes this point, she mentions, the coin like many other objects that native American bring when they travel to long distant place, coin also one thing that American people interested with and bring it when travel to settlement where Nores are found.
Second, the author argues, by saying no other coins found in the sites where inhabited by Nores. The professor contradicts this argument, she points out to the fact that,Nores settlement is temprery not permenant, they brought coins with them when they had traveled to the United states, then return the back with them to Uroep.
Finally, the author claims, the coins do not use as money in United states like in Uroep. The professor in the other hand elaborates on the interesting of American people with beautiful things, and the silver coins are very attractive to them, therefore, norse brought coins with them when they came to the north America.
The reading passage and lecture are talking about silver coins that are discovered in the north America, the people believe the coin brought to these sites by European explorers called the Nores. The author claims that coin is not genuine historical evidence and it is fake. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article, she mentions that this coin has a genuine historical evidence.
First, the writer states, the coin present in area far away from the site that Nores settled in. The lecturer refutes this point, she mentions, the coin like many other objects that native American bring when they travel to long distant place, coin also one thing that American people interested with and bring it when travel to settlement where Nores are found.
Second, the author argues, by saying no other coins found in the sites where inhabited by Nores. The professor contradicts this argument, she points out to the fact that,Nores settlement is temprery not permenant, they brought coins with them when they had traveled to the United states, then return the back with them to Uroep.
Finally, the author claims, the coins do not use as money in United states like in Uroep. The professor in the other hand elaborates on the interesting of American people with beautiful things, and the silver coins are very attractive to them, therefore, norse brought coins with them when they came to the north America.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-12 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The main topic of both reading passage and lecture about strange behavior of elephants The author claims several surprising behaviors of elephants However the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions these explanation about elephants beh 75
- The education is essentiat thing in children life therefor kids should obtain a good education with the enormous development of technology like invention of smart phone and presence of internet and a lot of social media some believe that these devices wil 70
- The reading and lecture about the old fossil of Tyrannosaurus The writer claims these fossils still contain remains of actul tissues lije blood vessels red blood cells and collagen matrix he elaborates three evidences T he lecturer casts doubt on claim ma 70
- The reading passage and lecture are talking about silver coins that are discovered in the north America the people believe the coin brought to these sites by European explorers called the Nores The author claims that coin is not genuine historical evidenc 60
- Making decision is a crucial thing that all people concern about The controveral is whether we have to share others in taking this decision or not This can be weighed in differnt ways Amidetly some people believe no one have a right to share them their ch 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture are talk...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hen return the back with them to Uroep Finally the author claims the coins do n...
^^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...them when they came to the north America
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83193277311 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17734643809 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 238.0 21.2450331126 1120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1150.0 110.228320801 1043% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 238.0 21.698381199 1097% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 68.0 7.06452816374 963% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514737596701 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.514737596701 0.0996497079465 517% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343143463817 0.162205337803 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.250324372323 0.0443174109184 565% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 120.3 13.3589403974 901% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -161.63 53.8541721854 -300% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 94.9 11.0289183223 860% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.21 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.03 8.42419426049 214% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 10.7273730684 522% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 97.2 10.498013245 926% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 95.0 11.2008830022 848% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.