The reading passage and lecture are talking about silver coins that are discovered in the north America, the people believe the coin brought to these sites by European explorers called the Nores. The author claims that coin is not genuine historical evidence and it is fake. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article, she mentions that this coin has a genuine historical evidence.
First, the writer states, the coin present in area far away from the site that Nores settled in. The lecturer refutes this point, she mentions, the coin like many other objects that native American bring when they travel to long distant place, coin also one thing that American people interested with and bring it when travel to settlement where Nores are found.
Second, the author argues, by saying no other coins found in the sites where inhabited by Nores. The professor contradicts this argument, she points out to the fact that,Nores settlement is temprery not permenant, they brought coins with them when they had traveled to the United states, then return the back with them to Uroep.
Finally, the author claims, the coins do not use as money in United states like in Uroep. The professor in the other hand elaborates on the interesting of American people with beautiful things, and the silver coins are very attractive to them, therefore, norse brought coins with them when they came to the north America.
The reading passage and lecture are talking about silver coins that are discovered in the north America, the people believe the coin brought to these sites by European explorers called the Nores. The author claims that coin is not genuine historical evidence and it is fake. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article, she mentions that this coin has a genuine historical evidence.
First, the writer states, the coin present in area far away from the site that Nores settled in. The lecturer refutes this point, she mentions, the coin like many other objects that native American bring when they travel to long distant place, coin also one thing that American people interested with and bring it when travel to settlement where Nores are found.
Second, the author argues, by saying no other coins found in the sites where inhabited by Nores. The professor contradicts this argument, she points out to the fact that,Nores settlement is temprery not permenant, they brought coins with them when they had traveled to the United states, then return the back with them to Uroep.
Finally, the author claims, the coins do not use as money in United states like in Uroep. The professor in the other hand elaborates on the interesting of American people with beautiful things, and the silver coins are very attractive to them, therefore, norse brought coins with them when they came to the north America.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-12 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The passage and lecture about cheatgrass which is an invasive species of grass these grass cause damage to the animal habitats and drive out other native plants in north American field The writer claims there are three methods to solve the probles get fro 80
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about carved stone ball which are type of artifact found in Scotland The writer claims three diffirent using of this stone ball The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions no one of these 60
- The reading and passage are both discus the effect of increase of population and agriculture in declination of bird population The author claim that increase in settlement and growth of agriculture in addition to increase in using of pesticide will cause 76
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about causes of extiniction of a huge type of marine mammal called Steller s sea cow which live in Steller The reading passage caims several reasons for extiniction However the lecturer casts doubt on c 66
- The passage and lecture about agnostids which were a group of marines animals which became extinct many years ago The writer claim that there are three theories about how agnostids ate and how they may lived The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in artic 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture are talk...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hen return the back with them to Uroep Finally the author claims the coins do n...
^^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...them when they came to the north America
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83193277311 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17734643809 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 238.0 21.2450331126 1120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1150.0 110.228320801 1043% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 238.0 21.698381199 1097% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 68.0 7.06452816374 963% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514737596701 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.514737596701 0.0996497079465 517% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343143463817 0.162205337803 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.250324372323 0.0443174109184 565% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 120.3 13.3589403974 901% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -161.63 53.8541721854 -300% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 94.9 11.0289183223 860% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.21 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.03 8.42419426049 214% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 10.7273730684 522% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 97.2 10.498013245 926% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 95.0 11.2008830022 848% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.