The reading and lecture are both about see otter, a small mammal that live in western coast of North America. The author claims that pollution is the main cause for see otter declination. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article. She says that predators are the possible reason for decrease in sea otter population.
First, the author state presence of a lot of source of pollution in the Alaskan coast such as oil, and industrial chemical pollution, he mentioned, water sample reveal chemical material that cause decrease in otter resistance to life threatening and thus indirectly cause their death. This point challenge by lecturer. She says these evidence is weak in explanation of otter declination by pollution, she mentions, if the cause of declination is pollution, why we never see dead sea otter in the side of peach, instead, this extremely explain that see otter declination is due to predators.
Second, the writer points out to the other mammals ‘declination like Orca (a large whale), he argues that decrease in otter population has impact on all ecosystem. The professor contradicts this argument, she claims, whale decrease due to human hunting, otter depend on these Orca for feeding, therefor, they have to change their feeding sources to small see species like snails and other small fishes, hence decrease in whales are not due to pollution.
Finally, the author illustrates to uneven pattern of otter decline, he believes that pollution is major cause of this unequal concentration, the lecturer in the other hand suggests that Orca has a huge size that un able it to present in shallow water, and as we know that otter on it in feeding, this will explain to us why otter has low population in especial area compare to others.
The reading and lecture are both about see otter, a small mammal that live in western coast of North America. The author claims that pollution is the main cause for see otter declination. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article. She says that predators are the possible reason for decrease in sea otter population.
First, the author state presence of a lot of source of pollution in the Alaskan coast such as oil, and industrial chemical pollution, he mentioned, water sample reveal chemical material that cause decrease in otter resistance to life threatening and thus indirectly cause their death. This point challenge by lecturer. She says these evidence is weak in explanation of otter declination by pollution, she mentions, if the cause of declination is pollution, why we never see dead sea otter in the side of peach, instead, this extremely explain that see otter declination is due to predators.
Second, the writer points out to the other mammals ‘declination like Orca (a large whale), he argues that decrease in otter population has impact on all ecosystem. The professor contradicts this argument, she claims, whale decrease due to human hunting, otter depend on these Orca for feeding, therefor, they have to change their feeding sources to small see species like snails and other small fishes, hence decrease in whales are not due to pollution.
Finally, the author illustrates to uneven pattern of otter decline, he believes that pollution is major cause of this unequal concentration, the lecturer in the other hand suggests that Orca has a huge size that un able it to present in shallow water, and as we know that otter on it in feeding, this will explain to us why otter has low population in especial area compare to others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-07 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about carved stone ball which are type of artifact found in Scotland The writer claims three diffirent using of this stone ball The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions no one of these 60
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about lit it burn policy like yellow stone fire which occur in United State which is mean not to suppress natural fires of forest The writer claims three kinds of damaged caused by the let it burn Howev 60
- The article and lecture about genetic modified tree The author elaborates three benefits from this process The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articl She says although there are benefits from these trees but there are obivios disadvantages First the 76
- The reading passage and the lecture are both about replacement for vihcels main source of power from internal combution engine which are used gasoline or diesel to hydroger based fuel cell engine The writer states three advantages from this replacement Ho 60
- The passage and lecture about the artificial reefs the writer demonstrates three benefits of artificial reefs for increasing suitible habitat for fish the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He says several scientists belivieve the artificial re 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and lecture are both about s...
^^
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e main cause for see otter declination. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in th...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for decrease in sea otter population. First, the author state presence of a lo...
^^^
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun source seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of sources'.
Suggestion: a lot of sources
... First, the author state presence of a lot of source of pollution in the Alaskan coast such ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otter declination is due to predators. Second, the writer points out to the oth...
^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this Orca' or 'these orcas'?
Suggestion: this Orca; these orcas
...e due to human hunting, otter depend on these Orca for feeding, therefor, they have to cha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on in especial area compare to others.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, second, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 5.01324503311 419% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97297297297 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6628737559 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537162162162 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.20051635 49.2860985944 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.2 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 21.698381199 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478182352662 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220668922064 0.0996497079465 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175668092376 0.0662205650399 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320935510293 0.162205337803 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.26779146421 0.0443174109184 604% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.