The passage and lecture about agnostids which were a group of marines animals which became extinct many years ago. The writer claim that, there are three theories about how agnostids ate and how they may lived. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articl. She says all these theories have vsever weakness..
First of all, the author states that agnostids may have been free-swimming predators, there were plenty of smaller organisms in ocean for agnostids to prey on. This point challenged by professor. She says, the agnostids has a large eyes to detect the prey, but many of them blind, however they can not see prey, as a result, they were not be as predators.
In addition, the author argue, the agnostids may have habitats on seefloor,they are concidered as examples of primitive arthropods living in this way. This argumentb rebutts by professor. She mentions, the agnostids do not have ability to movev fast and far, they moved slowly, furthermore, the arthropods which livev in the seefloor move fast and long distance to search for food that agnostids can not do that.
Finally, the writer of passage suggests, there is apossiblity that the agnostids were parasites, moreover, they living on and feeding off larger organisms. The professor in the other hand posite, the parasites are small in size, they present in few population, and do not able to stay in a high number, instead, the agnostids as the fossils show have a large size with large population. according to nthese information , they never be concidered as parasites
The passage and lecture about agnostids which were a group of marines animals which became extinct many years ago. The writer claim that, there are three theories about how agnostids ate and how they may lived. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articl. She says all these theories have vsever weakness..
First of all, the author states that agnostids may have been free-swimming predators, there were plenty of smaller organisms in ocean for agnostids to prey on. This point challenged by professor. She says, the agnostids has a large eyes to detect the prey, but many of them blind, however they can not see prey, as a result, they were not be as predators.
In addition, the author argue, the agnostids may have habitats on seefloor,they are concidered as examples of primitive arthropods living in this way. This argumentb rebutts by professor. She mentions, the agnostids do not have ability to movev fast and far, they moved slowly, furthermore, the arthropods which livev in the seefloor move fast and long distance to search for food that agnostids can not do that.
Finally, the writer of passage suggests, there is apossiblity that the agnostids were parasites, moreover, they living on and feeding off larger organisms. The professor in the other hand posite, the parasites are small in size, they present in few population, and do not able to stay in a high number, instead, the agnostids as the fossils show have a large size with large population. according to nthese information , they never be concidered as parasites
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-06 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The passage and lecture are both talking about presence of soft tissue from remnant of blood vessels in resent discovered fossils The author claims three evidences which support present of soft tissue blood vessels in these fossils The lecturer casts doub 60
- The passage and lecture are both about the advantages of team work group The author claims several advantage of group work The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article He contradictes each one First the reading passage states working as a group i 60
- The reading and lecture about the old fossil of Tyrannosaurus The writer claims these fossils still contain remains of actul tissues lije blood vessels red blood cells and collagen matrix he elaborates three evidences T he lecturer casts doubt on claim ma 70
- In our wold there are many celebrities and famous people who have their opnion that may influance others around them The question is whether those celebrities more important for young people than older or not This can be weighed in many aspects Admittedly 76
- The passage and lecture are mainly about burning mirror which is type of weapon used by Creek to defence themselives from Roman attack readind passage claim that story of burning mirror is just myth Lecturer castsc doubt on claim made in article She menti 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture about agnostids ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...w agnostids ate and how they may lived. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... all these theories have vsever weakness.. First of all, the author stat...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... these theories have vsever weakness.. First of all, the author states that agn...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'eye'?
Suggestion: eye
...or. She says, the agnostids has a large eyes to detect the prey, but many of them bl...
^^^^
Line 2, column 348, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ot see prey, as a result, they were not be as predators. In addition, the...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...result, they were not be as predators. In addition, the author argue, the agnos...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
... agnostids may have habitats on seefloor,they are concidered as examples of primitive...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r food that agnostids can not do that. Finally, the writer of passage suggests,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: small
...he other hand posite, the parasites are small in size, they present in few population, and do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun population seems to be countable; consider using: 'few populations'.
Suggestion: few populations
...ites are small in size, they present in few population, and do not able to stay in a high numb...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 397, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...ave a large size with large population. according to nthese information , they never be c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 428, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ulation. according to nthese information , they never be concidered as parasites
^^
Line 4, column 436, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put after the verb 'be'.
Suggestion: be never
... according to nthese information , they never be concidered as parasites
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, so, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98837209302 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64300873015 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565891472868 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2116263638 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 4.19205298013 334% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452558798674 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157863848177 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182280823523 0.0662205650399 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290347871322 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.28961955542 0.0443174109184 654% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.