The reading passage says about the reasons for Steller sea cows extinction but the
lecture in the listening passage challenges points in the reading passage.
The professor says that Steller sea cows' weight was about 10 tons. They were too big, heavy, so people were unable to hunt a lot of them. The first reason for their extinction was titled overhunting. Extinction is a result of large-scale hunting.
If food shortage is another reason for extinction, then other marine animals and creatures had become extinct as well. But other animals were not extinct at that time, only the Steller sea cows. The reading says when kelp began to decline, which is a kind of food, the source of food began to decrease too, which causes Steller sea cows to become extinct.
The third point is traders. Steller sea cows were extincted 1000 years before entering europian
traders in that area. It says that sea cows already had become small.
So this investigation challenges the reading's point about traders. Traders sold
cows' fur. Trading had a lot of interest and made money for them.
In conclusion, there are other reasons for their extinction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-08 | mahrokh mirzaei | 60 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | mahrokh mirzaei | 60 | view |
- The reading passage says about the reasons for Steller sea cows extinction but the lecture in the listening passage challenges points in the reading passage 60
- The reading passage says about the reasons for Steller sea cows extinction but the lecture in the listening passage challenges points in the reading passage 60
- If food shortage is another reason for extinction then other marine animals and creatures had become extinct as well But other animals were not extinct at that time only the Steller sea cows The reading says when kelp began to decline which is a kind of f
- The professor says that Steller sea cows weight was about 10 tons They were too big heavy so people were unable to hunt a lot of them The first reason for their extinction was titled overhunting Extinction is a result of large scale hunting
- children s education 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, third, well, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 1373.03311258 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 167.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91017964072 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39839608399 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 145.348785872 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 419.366225166 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2682247058 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 58.5714285714 110.228320801 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.9285714286 21.698381199 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307830749997 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103901779823 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598387685167 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141276232259 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456297497799 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.3589403974 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.23 53.8541721854 143% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 11.0289183223 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.31 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 63.6247240618 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.