The reading passage states that many frog species around the world have declined in numbers due to changes in their environment and the writer provided some solution for this problem. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
The reading passage states that many frog species around the world have declined in numbers due to changes in their environment and the writer provided some solution for this problem. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article frogs are being harmed by pesticides which are used by farmers and if laws prohibited them from using pesticides it would reduce the harm to frogs. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that this idea is not fair from the economic aspect. If the farmers hinder using pesticides, their harvest losses its quality, and farmers near these areas can not compete with other farmers.
Second, the reading passage claims that one major factor in the frog population decline is a fungus that has spread with deadly effect on them. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture validates the information and makes the points that this approach for protection frogs population is so costly and need to capture and treat every frog individually.
Third, the reading passage puts forward the idea that frog populations are decline because their natural habitats are threatened by human activities. In the same way, the speaker justifies the idea and adds that the biggest threat is global warming, and this phenomenon changes frogs environment.
To sum up, both the writer and lecturer hold conflicting views about the protection of frogs population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-06 | Elhamsarvari | 76 | view |
- negative aspects of playing computer games between young children 76
- ecocertified wood 81
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- equal financial support for sport and social activities as classes and libraries 60
- Do agree and disagree with the following statements Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22916666667 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55546459681 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3192365882 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465683895898 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173465091309 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.214321128597 0.0662205650399 324% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277055545995 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.316907350453 0.0443174109184 715% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.