TPO 16 Integrated Writing Task

Essay topics:

TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task

The reading passage states that in the twentieth century most of the archaeologists forced with serious problems and limitations in Britain. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubts on the points made in the reading.

First, considering the article many precious artifacts were lost during the construction projects. The writer thinks that the process with construction did not preserve the artifacts and many of them were destroyed. In contrast, the professor contradicts the idea and further explains that at the beginning of any construction process archaeologists exam the location and always government makes a plan for valuable sites, such as shifting the construction process to other areas or make supporting plans for excavation zone carefully and after that starting to construction projects.

Second, the reading passage claims that many archaeologists felt that the financial support for research was inadequate. Admittedly, the speaker justifies the information presented in the reading and makes the point that government paid financial support to construction companies for supporting these kinds of projects, also government gives value to archaeological excavations.

Third, the professor in the reading passage puts forward the idea that it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. In the same way, the speaker validates the idea and adds that government annually represents and supports different job positions in archaeology at various dimensions like researcher, data processor, construction supervisor, etc.

To sum up, both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about this issue.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-09 sonyeoso 90 view
2020-05-19 Elhamsarvari 70 view
2020-02-25 Seyed Armin Mirhosseini 80 view
2020-02-25 Seyed Armin Mirhosseini 80 view
2019-09-09 zhrnrz-1992 65 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Elhamsarvari :

Comments

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 12
No. of Words: 242 250
No. of Characters: 1361 1200
No. of Different Words: 139 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.944 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.624 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.062 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 91 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.2 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.408 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.397 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.739 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.119 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4