reading passage was about evidences for recognizing a portrait of Jane Austen - mahdieh
The reading and lecture are both about a portrait that seems to belong to teenage Jane Austen. The article states that this portrait belongs to young Austen and provide three reasons for support. however, the professor explains that the evidence not at all convincing that the portrait linking to her and refutes each of the author reasons.
The article mentions that Austen's family recognize the girl in portrait as teenage Jane Austen. The professor refutes this point. he states that the portrait was shown to the public 70 years after her death. So none of the relevant that recognizes that as Austen's portrait, sow her by themselves.
The article claims that the portrait is like the only sketch of Janes' face even in details like eyebrows, nose and etc. however, the lecture contends that at that time Jane Austen had a lot of cousin in that age and he believes the portrait belongs to one of her distant relatives.
Moreover, it is stated in the article that there is some evidence of the painter that was active in the period when she was a teenager. The lecture opposes this point. there is a stamp on the back of the canvas that suggested that the portrait was painted 27 years after Jane Austen birth and it can't belong to teenage Austen.
- reading passage was about evidences for recognizing a portrait of Jane Austen - mahdieh 70
- TPO 11: a decline in reading the literature 73
- reading passage was about evidences for recognizing a portrait of Jane Austen - mahdieh 76
- reading passage was about evidences for recognizing a portrait of Jane Austen - mahdieh 76
- TPO 19 integrated essayMany consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people they 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... and provide three reasons for support. however, the professor explains that the eviden...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...sten. The professor refutes this point. he states that the portrait was shown to t...
^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ace even in details like eyebrows, nose and etc. however, the lecture contends that at t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun cousin seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of cousins'.
Suggestion: a lot of cousins
...tends that at that time Jane Austen had a lot of cousin in that age and he believes the portrai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...enager. The lecture opposes this point. there is a stamp on the back of the canvas th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...27 years after Jane Austen birth and it cant belong to teenage Austen.
^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...27 years after Jane Austen birth and it cant belong to teenage Austen.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72272727273 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27314087146 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495454545455 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3208146365 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5833333333 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 7.06452816374 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388714957545 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139555113867 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945046461125 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240045849133 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625629785904 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.