Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt.
The reading and the lecture both discussed whether one particular painting was by the hand of Rembrandt. The reading claims that the painting was not the works of Rembrandt due to three reasons. However, the lecturer completely refutes these reasons.
First, the passage says that the fur collar in the portrait is not match with the lady in the painting. The lecture refutes it and presents a new evidence suggests that new pigment was found on the top of the collar by some mechandisers to inflate the price of painting.
Second, the professor also contradits the reading that the light in the portrait do not make sense. Like the collar fur, the original painting was covered by the later added pigment, hence the inconsistent.
At last, the reading points out that Rembrandt would never use a glued panel to serve his art. Again, the speaker brings out a new found study that the picture is in fact a single piece of wood, the several pieces of glued wood was also attached by the sellers in the hope to made the painting more expensive. Besides, the wood used in this picture was cut from the same tree that used to be a self portrait painting by Rembrandt.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-10 | f.jafary66@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2019-12-19 | sandeshbhandari2 | 83 | view |
2019-11-29 | shingwa | 80 | view |
2019-11-17 | Suthasith | 70 | view |
2019-11-09 | Chara | 60 | view |
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 66
- Which way is the best for students to make new friends: joining a sport team, participating in community activities, or travelling? 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, however, second, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68932038835 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3993943057 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538834951456 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1260014718 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184612684313 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802793350253 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778130414149 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107666161114 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858449935228 0.0443174109184 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 63.6247240618 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.