The author states that though the representation of the woman's face is very much like the portraits painted by Rembrandt but there are many problems with the painting and gives three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that after careful re-examination of the painting by experts it was proved that the portrait is indeed painted by Rembrandt and she refutes each of the authors' reasons.
First, the reading claims that there is inconsistency in the way the woman in the portrait is dressed. Pointing out that the woman is seen wearing a cap that is only worn by the servants while her coat has a luxurious fur collar which resembles a higher class. The professor refutes this point by saying that the pigment over the fur collar was topped 100 years after the painting was painted. According to the professor, it was done in order to increases the worth of the painting and give the woman a rich look.
Second, the author posits that though Rembrandt is a master of light and shadow, these elements in the painting do not fit together. The professor explains that if they see the original painting where the coat has a simple collar which is light in color. She also says that this lightly colored collar reflects light onto the face of the woman thus the portrait has shown no shadow on the face.
Third, the reading states that the painting was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together but Rembrandt is not known to use a panel glued together in this way. The professor opposed this point by explaining that the painting was originally painted in a single panel of wood like his other paintings. We also learn that in order to give it a grand look it was enlarged by gluing several pieces of wood panels.
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 73
- TOEFL integrated writing Dutch painter Rembrandt 38
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific details and examples to support your answer 77
- Professors appearance on televisions 80
- TOEFL integrated writing: Endotherms 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, thus, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67096774194 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3989765421 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48064516129 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6330609454 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207735918129 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864816035314 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748389722836 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139556934186 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701741341881 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 53.8541721854 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.