Should buzzing be banned.
Reading and writing are about that buzzing be banned. More specifically, in regard to passages, the author believes that buzzing is dangerous for our society, and supports his opinion by providing three arguments. Speaker is quick to point out that there are some serious flaws in the claims made by the author, and addresses, in detail the trouble with each point in reading text. In fact, speaker is of the opinion that buzzing is helpful for our society.
To begin with, the author mentions that buzzers are paid for endorses a product, therefore, information shared by them can be incorrect. Nevertheless, the speaker contradicts this point by pointing out that companies find people and hire them who have used their product and find that product is good to be used. Next, he gives an example of a phone connection which he will advertise as he himself has used it and found it good.
Secondly, the author claims that when buzzers advertise a product, people don’t ask them much questions. Furthermore, he adds that when the same person will see that product in a TV commercial they will pay much attention to each claim made in that ad. Yet, the speaker challenges this claim by revealing that his own experience is opposite to this. He elaborates this by stating that whenever he tries to sell any product people have lot of questions about price, service and how long I have been using the product.
Finally, the author wraps up his argument by positing that buzzing effects social relationships as it creates an environment of dishonesty and less trust on people we met each day. Not surprisingly, in contrast to author’s argument, the speaker suggest that companies with bad products can’t hire buzzers as they know about quality of their product. Additionally, he note that people who will use the product sold by a buzzer will be happy only as they got product from trustworthy sources would has sold the product after using the same.
To sum up, the author and the lecturer has conflicting views regarding banning of buzzing. It is clear that they will have trouble finding a common ground on this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | JohnSmith96 | 80 | view |
- Driverless cars 80
- In many places, students aged 12-18 are typically taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are usually taught by only one teacher all day long. However, it would also benefit younger students to be taught by several different 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements makes product seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Comics being an art form unique to America 78
- Driverless cars 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...e a product, people don't ask them much questions. Furthermore, he adds that wh...
^^^^
Line 13, column 378, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'notes'.
Suggestion: notes
...lity of their product. Additionally, he note that people who will use the product so...
^^^^
Line 13, column 507, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
... product from trustworthy sources would has sold the product after using the same. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, in fact, in contrast to, in regard to, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 22.412803532 223% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93093922652 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.632335792 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527624309392 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0765579376 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5625 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105271483487 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523781497402 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107716934374 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063127243615 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720082615906 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.