smart cars
The article introduces the topic of smart cars more specifically, the writer discusses the benefits of advanced smart car technology and its possible benefits. The lecturer in the listening passage disagrees. She believes that the smart car innovations overall will not be ground-breaking, and she casts doubt on the claims made in the article.
First of all, the author begins by stating that smart car technology will prevent many traffic accidents. The writer adds, since those cars will be controlled by the only one operator, the system will eliminate the accidents. The lecturer, however, disagrees. She states that even the most advanced technologies sometimes make mistakes. Moreover, she adds due to the fact that there will be only one main system the number of involvement of cars will be tremendous and this situation might even be resulting in a huge disaster. She continues by stating there will be no guarantee that these cars will make the traffic more peaceful.
Secondly, according to the author, within the smart car advancement, people will spend less time commuting. This is because, the computer-controlled cars will be connected to each other therefore, the highway speeds can be increased, and this means people will spend less time in traffic. On the contrary, the professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s argument. The speaker holds that the number of cars will be increased too, given the history, people will want to experience driving these smart cars and therefore, there will be more cars in the traffic.
Finally, the author mentions that the travel expenses will be reduced since most routes will be direct ones and there will be no need for expenses such as, tire and brake repairs. On the other hand, the professor in the listening passage is doubtful that this is accurate. She claims that the high technology which is used to operate smart cars are quite expensive. She continues by stating that additional tools such as sensors and sophisticated applications to the smart cars will make these cars expensive, therefore, once they broke the cost of repairment will be high as well. The professor says, the expenses even will be higher than the usual car expenses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-17 | Julie.Zhu | 85 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | villian7 | 75 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
- Technology has made children less creative than the past Do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- There s no doubt that Turtle Excluder Devices are a great idea that must be used by every single shrimping boat However they are far from perfect and in need of drastic improvement regardless of what the author in the reading may believe 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 48
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed play them Do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- Some people think history has little or nothing to offer while others say the study of the past helps understand the present 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubt on the claims made in the article. First of all, the author begins by stati...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will make the traffic more peaceful. Secondly, according to the author, withi...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here will be more cars in the traffic. Finally, the author mentions that the tr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 5.04856512141 456% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 364.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74269401987 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464285714286 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6231596988 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349295164536 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152746798425 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149162837322 0.0662205650399 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301213547046 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102613644879 0.0443174109184 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.