Both the reading and the lecture talk about smart cars. The former provides three reasons that these smart cars will make driving safer, quicker and less expensive. The professor, on the other hand, casts doubt on these ideas one by one by saying that these vehicles will not have clear benefits because of the following reasons.
First of all, both the author and the lecturer posit whether smart vehicles will prohibit accidents or not. The reading suggests that it will save lives by decreasing many accidents due to their automatic programs and a wide variety of sensors despite human poor job when it comes to avoiding road accidents. The speaker, in contrast, rebuts the idea by pointing out that even most technological vehicles fail sometimes. Accordingly, when these failures occur, they can be piled up resulting in a worse situation than today’s circumstances. As a result, it will not reduce injuries and save lives as stated in the passage.
Second of all, both the writer and the professor put forward both the increase in highway speed and decrease in commuting time. The article claims that because of the computer handled cars, they can have high speeds in highways giving rise to lessening commute time for those who come and go with their own cars. The lecturer, however, refutes this by mentioning that these cars allow more people decide to drive themselves. Hence, smart vehicles will not diminish commuting time since they will not take advantage of high speeds provided by those cars.
Finally, both the text and the speaker put forth whether they will reduce the costs of driving or not. The text avers that smart ones will lower the costs by taking direct routes handled by their programs and also expensive items will last much longer time. The speaker, conversely, rejects the idea by explaining that these high tech devices will be expensive. According to her, they will use other technology capabilities such as sensors to help these cars how far they should stay. Additionally, repair costs will be more expensive too and will not be compensated.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 76
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago there was a mass extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 14 70
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 70
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils the petrified remains of ancient organisms ever since the eighteenth century In recent years however the sale of fossils particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates has grown into a big bus 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'one by'.
Suggestion: one by
... other hand, casts doubt on these ideas one by one by saying that these vehicles will not hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, second, so, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 348.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99712643678 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42630004188 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554597701149 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9415134287 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.294117647 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201613334072 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641601725285 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443810058648 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120545398593 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276616095257 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.